Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Machaon who wrote (11569)	2/12/1999 5:03:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13994

<<I don't know how many of the various religions would agree with you about babies' souls going to Hell.>> I never suggested any such thing, liar. Typical, of your bs. You can play that word twisting game and get apologies from your saviour wannabees on this thread but not me. You are a phony, dirt bag, bent on adolescent teasing with sincere adults. Grow up man. <<If I ask what happens to a fetus's soul, is that so sacrilegious?>> I answered that question. The job of judging souls is taken. My speculation on yours, mine, or anothers is out of line. <<And I thought that your religion was more compassionate.>> As a matter of fact God is merciful and compassionate. My religion does encourage its adherents to show mercy and compassion for those sincere individuals who are trying to serve God but struggling. You don't qualify. Your method of inquiry is a setup, it is transparent, phony and doesn't qualify as a sincere question. Even though most respondants give you answers that are heart felt, you trash them without real consideration for their point of view. You cheap tease. Do you give seminars for hookers. They might find that interesting or cute, I don't. <<I think that you have become very angry because I have exposed a little hypocrisy on what you...>> I can't speak for anybody else but you have not evoked any anger from me. The fact that I see through your attempts to trap religious people in a doctrinal contradiction is no great feat. World class scholars on religion and social sciences, debate this issue with intelligence. I respect that. Most of the people you are posting to are educated at a high level on this particular subject and are merely displaying patience with your infantile, and shallow remarks of "Oh yeah what about....." You recieve thoughtful answers, ignor them and go right on with more childishness. You are a pompous and ignorant twit. You spread crap all around your self and challenge everyone to prove it isn't gems. Patience is the only attention you are getting for it probably because some of the religious people on the thread think they have an obligation to save you. I am not one of them. I am not one of the saviours of lost sheep who think it is simply a matter of some people lacking information. You choose your perspective and it is clearly a rejection of the righteous nature God gave you the free will to select. God can change you if he so wills. I have no such authority and no pretence to the power to change someone choosing ignorance and darkness. You are not a seeker, I see through these phony ploys of yours as the thin transparent fabric of a fake. As if you had sincere concern for the well being of fetus souls....chaa right robert. I have read lots of your posts on the subject, you fraud. Your enemy, brees