Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (98105)	2/12/1999 3:13:00 PM
From: D. Swiss	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 176387

I think a computer driven buy program just kicked in (since the Lemmings aren't capable of rational thought). :o) Drew

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (98105)	2/12/1999 3:29:00 PM
From: Mohan Marette	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 176387

<--OT-->More on Colluding interests. Paul: What do you think about this now? ================================ Friday February 12, 2:48 pm Eastern Time Suits against US option markets seen hard to prove By Debra Sherman CHICAGO, Feb 12 (Reuters) - Two lawsuits against U.S. options exchanges that allege the exchanges colluded to keep prices artificially high are likely to have a difficult time in court, securities lawyers said. The suits, filed in New York earlier this month, are seeking class action status. One was filed by Andrew Friedman, a New York attorney who was involved in a similar class-action suit against the Nasdaq electronic stock market filed in 1994 and settled last month. The complaints allege that the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE), the American Stock Exchange, the Pacific Exchange, the Philadelphia Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange conspired to keep spreads -- the difference between bid and ask prices -- unfairly wide on options listed on only one exchange. The New York Stock Exchange sold its options business to the CBOE in 1997. The suit filed by Friedman charges that ''each exchange agreed to voluntarily refrain from listing and trading class options to purchase or sell the underlying stock of certain blue chip corporations...because option classes...of such corporations had previously been traded exclusively on just one of the five then existing exchanges prior to January 20, 1990.'' The leading exchanges have long had a tacit agreement to leave existing single listings unchallenged while competing only for new listings. Securities attorney Charles Mills of Kirkpatrick & Lockhart of Washington, D.C., said the exchanges are likely to argue that creating copycat contracts would have been too expensive when a competing exchange had all the liquidity. Mills said the case against the Nasdaq, charged with duping customers by failing to provide the best prices and failing to honor posted stock quotes, was more straightforward and easier to prove than the suits against the options exchanges. ''Here, they will have to look at all the exchanges,'' he said. ''It's a massive undertaking, whereas in the Nasdaq case there was just one market. In my view, the suits against the exchanges will be more difficult to prove liability.'' Arthur Don, a securities attorney and partner at D'Ancona & Pfaum in Chicago, agreed. ''I'm not sure how they can infer there was collusion to keep the spreads wide,'' he said. ''The suit looks like it's modeled after the Nasdaq (lawsuit), but I think it will be more difficult to prove. In the Nasdaq case, they had tapes of conversations.'' Friedman acknowledged that his suit might be more difficult to prove. ''This may be a harder case than the Nasdaq case. We'll see,'' he said. Friedman said he has been examining the issue of multiple listings and said that spreads are wider on contracts that are singly listed. He said he planned to subpoena market makers, traders and clearing firms as well as exchange officials. For years, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has urged the options exchanges to list each other's options contracts in order to create more competitive markets. More recently, the SEC urged the four exchanges to link their markets to the National Market System, an electronic order-execution system created about 25 years ago by Congress, to ensure that trades would be executed at the best price. The SEC first suggested a linkup 10 years ago, the CBOE said. The U.S. Justice Department has been investigating the exchanges' listing practices, although it has not yet issued a report on its findings. ''There's not anything new in this suit,'' CBOE spokeswoman Carol Kennedy said. ''They are the same issues as the Justice Department looked at. Private actions like this (suit) are something that often follow a government investigation.'' The other exchanges declined to comment.

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (98105)	2/12/1999 3:34:00 PM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 176387

CTC, Drew, Mohan, Kemble and Others... I just picked up a new update from Merrill Lynch and it is quite positive. Here are their latest comments on DELL: Merrill Lynch Intra-Day Special Call (2/12/99) "DELL shares are weak today primarily due to a competitors statement that DELL's revenues will be light for the quarter, specifically $5.2B vs. $5.5B, due to a slower corporate market and pricing pressure from IBM resulting in lower ASPs (Average Selling Prices)." "We think our $5.6B revenue forecast for 4Q may be a bit high but maintain our $.32 EPS estimate vs. consensus of $0.31. We do believe the company's revenues for the quarter will exceed $5.2B." "The corporate PC market is not as robust as the consumer PC market and DELL does not get a high percentage of its revenues from the consumer market." "We believe DELL is gaining significant market share in the corporate market." "We expect revenue growth to slow over time; from 50% in 1999 to roughly 37-40% in 2000." "We maintain our LONG TERM BUY rating and would particularly use the weakness as a buying opportunity" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hmmmmmm......it sounds like DELL is quite a stock to own. CS First Boston, SG Cowen, Morgan Stanley, and now Merrill Lynch are all quite confident about DELL's health and its future. I will continue to hold all of my shares and look forward to next week. -Scott