Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: john t. brice who wrote (8252)	2/12/1999 5:18:00 PM
From: Sig	Respond to of 27311

To one and all. I think the most interesting thing said on the CC call was Lev's response to a question about how soon he'll be able to announce something re OEMS. He explained about the "process" and the way that has to work, and said -- and this is the kicker -- they're beginning to take us seriously. That may not sound like a lot, but to me it was his first really open commitment about being involved with any if not all of the major players.

To: john t. brice who wrote (8252)	2/12/1999 5:20:00 PM
From: MHS	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

After listening the CC, I think Lev was answering the Barron's article as directly as he could. It is also interesting that he becomes more forthcoming each conference call. My guess is he is feeling less pressure to be hyper-cautious because the risk is a lot lower that they will not succeed. I also think that, again, he did everything he could but spell it out. But without spelling it out, I am sure that several of our poster from the dark side will be on again, slamming Lev and the company. mhs

To: john t. brice who wrote (8252)	2/12/1999 5:32:00 PM
From: Rich Wolf	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

Duckster, Agreed. Lev fumbled over his words a bit at that point, first saying 'polymer bag,' then correcting himself...and since I was taking sketchy longhand, not shorthand, notes, and filling in things elsewhere, wasn't sure what he'd decided on (left a hole in my notes, there). I think you're right, he did settle on 'plastic bag,' in the end. Thanks for the fill-in. Rich PS Now where do I remember the phrase 'battery in a bag(gie)' from? (this goes waaaay back, I think...)