Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Internet Analysis - Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (168)	2/13/1999 6:24:00 PM
From: Steve Robinett	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 419

CTC, Since this thread is supposed to be about developing methods of analyzing Internet stocks, let me raise something that's been a hobby horse of mine for a while, the linear growth of companies like AOL. I just went through AOL's 10-Q. Advertising and e-commerce contributed 18.85% of revenues as compared to the year ago quarter when they contributed 18.41%, proportionately a flat contribution. (Though e-comm and ads contributed a higher percentage than last quarter, the difference is explained by AOL itself as seasonality.) Contrary to the suggestions of almost everyone that AOL will leverage their customer base and boost the contribution of advertising and e-commerce, in fact, there is no evidence for this idea, only evidence that AOL is still growing in a linear fashion. Add a customer, earn more--not earn more from existing customers. Though cash flow will certainly grow as the dollar amount of the higher margin advertising and e-commerce grow, AOL is still growing proportional to its customer growth. Currently, that's about 100% per year (AOL added 1 million subscribers in January to its 15 million base which is 6% per month compounded and produces about 100% per year) At 100% growth rate and assuming a $.59 cash flow, AOL discounts to zero in about 8 years, when under these assumptions it will have about 3.8 billion customers. What's wrong with this picture? Best, --Steve