SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Grainne who wrote (30787)2/13/1999 9:47:00 PM
From: Jacques Chitte  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
>You still haven't explained how it would be possible for the Centers for Disease Control to alter the gun
violence deaths reported from other countries, without all of them noticing it.<

Have I made this claim? No. Why are you asking me to defend your spin?
You have made up your mind that we live in a very violent society. You're entitled to that opinion. I'm entitled to the opinion that... that's your opinion. But asking me to operate from the premise of your opinion gets old fast.

>I would much rather have my home invaded by police looking for weapons than change the way I go
about my day because I am afraid that I will be a victim of a crime. <

Here you are implying that Guns = Violence. It ain't so. Where citizens are given the right to carry, violent crime is rolled back! "When guns are outlawed, the outlaws will have the guns." And when you invite absolute police power under the guise of confiscating illegal weapons - you seem to think you can tell the police "This far but no farther". I submit the personal, subjective opinion that that is either naive or dishonest.

Christine, we will never have fruitful discussions if I am relentlessly forced to untangle the logical nooses you set. You say we are such a violent society and things will be So Much Better if we just exorcise firearms! I disagree. If I didn't I would forfeit my rights as a gun owner/operator. That's why I even post on the topic. The lurkers may or may not be an impressionable bunch, and it is worth reminding them that some of the things you post as ironclad established fact are more likely to be naked spin. In my ever so humble opinion.



To: Grainne who wrote (30787)2/14/1999 8:47:00 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
Question One: most rapes are committed by men, using penises. In order to prevent rape, should we ban penises? Should the police confiscate them?



To: Grainne who wrote (30787)2/14/1999 8:51:00 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
Question Two:

Guns have the following uses:

1. Self-defense and defense of others in the home.

2. Sport (target shooting, hunting).

3. Killing varmints.

4. Killing dinner.

5. Assisting in the commission of crime.

6. Suicide.

Only use number 5 is immoral. Why do you want to prevent law-abiding people from the lawful use of a useful tool?

I realize I have not read the entire thread, but I promise not to harass you to death.