SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (22634)2/14/1999 5:24:00 PM
From: thebeach  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 77397
 
I agree,Jach is very similar to Darren who graced these threads some time ago.The same fate is deserved.



To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (22634)2/15/1999 1:36:00 AM
From: jach  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 77397
 
<obvious that you came to this thread looking for the reactions that you have received. The amazing thing is that you act offended when you get the desired result>

amazing assumptions, who do you think you're, Jorjy the great fortune teller?
The following links are some of what were posted:

Message 7749767
Message 7813764
Message 7813842

These posts all dealt with important information for CSCO holders. And what kind of replies to these posts? Some sad examples (in fact all are in the same sad category) and well deserving proper replies:

1. A stupid crazy picture of some one called Donald W. Matter Message 7819018
2. From a zonking Zoltan! said "going nowhere slowly" - what an eye opener for information as a response
Message 7808250

Should I say more? what a sad little bunch here.



To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (22634)2/15/1999 1:01:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 77397
 
>>It is obvious that you came to
this thread looking for the reactions that you have received.<<

jorj, that doesn't excuse the reactions. just b/c a dissenting opinion is expressed, and it can be inferred that some folks are too immature to handle said opinions, doesn't mean the dissenting opinion is at fault - even if your biases want it to be true.