Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (40081)	2/14/1999 5:49:00 PM
From: KeepItSimple	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

And Amazon is the fastest growing (although likely never profitable) internet bookseller. The analogy still holds, just because a company is growing quickly doesnt mean it has any chances at success. Unless you define success as making the insiders rich through dumping shares to an eager but uninformed public market. >Until that happened, Power was the fastest growing computer company ever.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (40081)	2/14/1999 10:40:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

Published Monday, January 11, 1999, in the San Jose Mercury News SILICON STREET/ADAM LASHINSKY PC stocks may get a plug out of Y2K problem Y2K is seen as a reason to step up purchases of PCs. BY ADAM LASHINSKY Mercury News Staff Writer IN mid-October -- what we now know was the trough of the market for tech stocks -- nearly every analyst who mattered was bearish on prospects for the rest of last year and this one. An exception was Michael K. Kwatinetz, technology research director for Credit Suisse First Boston Corp. in New York. Kwatinetz, a former software entrepreneur, didn't see the slowdown others saw in the growth rate of personal computers, he didn't see tech stocks staying down, and he wasn't overly concerned about the investment ramifications of the year 2000 computing problem. He was right about the first two key metrics, and he isn't backing down on the third, the dreaded Y2K problem. ''It's going to be a positive for the PC sector, which in turn will drive a lot of other sectors,'' says Kwatinetz, who recently began his annual three-month sojourn in California (talking point: Can someone who leaves an office in Manhattan every winter for one in Palo Alto be dimwitted?). Kwatinetz can -- and does -- go on at length on why Y2K doesn't frighten him. But here is his thesis in a nutshell: Large enterprises with massive, outdated equipment have been fixing the problem for months. Any effects of their slowed spending has been felt. On the other hand, ''trailing-edge'' corporations and the government, as well as techno-challenged consumers, have put off PC-oriented upgrades for years. A significant portion see an ill-defined Y2K problem as a reason to step up their purchases of PCs. And they have plenty of time. ''What's the lead time to replace a PC?'' Kwatinetz muses. ''One day or so.'' The result is healthy PC purchases by bigger corporations completing their overall upgrades in the first half of the year and brisk activity by the upgrade crowd in the second half. ''There's a segment of the market that doesn't replace their PC very often,'' says Kwatinetz, who's not one of those people. ''I know analysts who still use DOS versions of Lotus spreadsheets.'' Many of these PC users have equipment that is not Y2K compliant. Computer aficionados know, of course, that it probably doesn't matter that someone toiling with a notebook computer running Windows 3.1 on a 486 processor (like this columnist) doesn't need to be Y2K compliant. That's because it's unlikely they'll be running applications where the clock is crucial. But a significant number won't know that. ''The problem is that figuring out if it matters is complicated and potentially expensive,'' argues Kwatinetz, who has made a career recommending stocks like Dell Computer Corp. (Nasdaq, DELL) and Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq, MSFT). ''So the question is, Will they be too scared to not replace their PCs? I think the answer is yes.'' Kwatinetz sees Dell being a particularly big winner because of its reputation for top-notch service. He also suggests -- but can't prove -- that Dell's gonzo customer, the U.S. government, already has told the direct-build king it will be upgrading PCs in massive amounts this year.