SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (34090)2/15/1999 1:47:00 PM
From: alan w  Respond to of 67261
 
You mean they won in spite of his helping him. That's what I thought.

alan w



To: TigerPaw who wrote (34090)2/15/1999 2:32:00 PM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
TigerPaw, only one problem in your analysis. The Democrats lost the last election. That's why we have a Republican majority in both houses of Congress.

Michael



To: TigerPaw who wrote (34090)2/15/1999 2:35:00 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
I wouldn't worry about Clinton campaigning in 2000. Unless it is for himself, Clinton has never lifted a finger for fellow dems. Sure, he'll raise a little money for them (as long as a golf course or good cigar is close by), but he won't exert himself. He's too selfish and lazy.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News