SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : E*Trade (NYSE:ET) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mod who wrote (5225)2/17/1999 12:05:00 AM
From: Tom Hua  Respond to of 13953
 
Dow Jones Newswires

E*Trade Says Two Class Action Suits Filed
In February

Dow Jones Newswires

NEW YORK -- Individual investors filed two class action suits against
E*Trade Group Inc. (EGRP) in February, the online brokerage said
Tuesday in a 10-Q filing to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

E*Trade said that on Feb. 11, Evan Berger filed a suit in the Supreme
Court of New York in Manhattan on behalf of himself and other
individuals. That follows the previously reported Feb. 8 filing of a class
action suit by Coleen Divito on behalf of herself and other individuals in the
Superior Court of California in Santa Clara.

E*Trade said in the filing that both suits allege that the company's
advertising, communications and business practices regarding its ability to
timely execute and confirm transactions through its online brokerage
services were false and deceptive.

The company also said that it believes "the claims are without merit and
intends to defend against them vigorously."

A class action suit filed on Nov. 21, 1997, in the Superior Court of
California, County of Santa Clara, by Larry Cooper is still pending against
the Palo Alto, Calif., company.

E*Trade also said in the filing that it expected to spend an additional $4
million on compliance costs related to the year 2000. E*Trade said it spent
about $1 million during the first quarter of fiscal 1999.

E*Trade said that during the first quarter, order flow rebates paid to the
company by the Nasdaq market makers in return for receiving its business
totaled $8 million. That was up from $6.8 million a year earlier but down
as a percentage of overall revenue to 13% from 18% in that same
year-ago period. E*Trade said that was due to no longer accounting for
revenue from its stake in Knight/Trimark Group Inc. (NITE) as order flow
rebates.

-Caroline Humer; 201-938 5234;
caroline.humer@cor.dowjones.com



To: mod who wrote (5225)2/17/1999 12:16:00 AM
From: Oeconomicus  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13953
 
White-shoe firms? OK, so perhaps EGRP deserves a higher P/B or P/E multiple than JC Bradford, but EGRP is still a stock broker. How 'bout white sneakers?

Still, my point was that the internet was, over the last few years, growing from a tiny handful of users to many tens of millions. You can't compare that explosive growth, the birth of a whole new industry, to the growth prospects of the brokerage business (or even just the online part of it) from this point forward.

BTW, did you know Citibank Investment Services offers (or soon will, I haven't had a chance to check it out) online trading for as low as $19.95 per trade? Did you know this service is tied into their online banking service which is about to kick off a major promotional campaign with the launch of their new financial portal site? Just thought you might want to consider that the competition isn't just old white-shoe firms or other online firms like AMTD. It is people with much bigger ambitions and resources than EGRP.

Bob