SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dayuhan who wrote (31060)2/17/1999 5:11:00 PM
From: Sidney Reilly  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
<<We all have the
right to destroy ourselves if we choose>>

That is true to a point, but their is a line. This gay orgy where someone has to be HIV positive, is that a protected right? Society tries to prevent a suicide, isn't that what that is? Slow suicide?

<<anonymous men who can only find gratification through commercial sex.>>

That's true, the gays don't have the corner on the market.

<<Does the Constitution guarantee the right to be an
asshole?>>

Well, yes, actually. At least it used to.

Emile? Gay Jews? I don't follow.



To: Dayuhan who wrote (31060)2/17/1999 5:41:00 PM
From: Rick Julian  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
Steven,

I've never seen "Alcoholic Pride", or "John Pride" Marches.

I am troubled by groups whose identity is so wrapped up in their sexuality--who choose to define themselves so inordinately by their particular sexual practices. It seems like such an absurd reduction of one's humanity to do so.

I just can't imagine defining myself in terms of where I put my penis, and in the most simple terms, I think this is the foundation of "Gay Pride". In my mind it is a neurotic obsession--one that makes me uncomfortable watching it being promoted--much as watching a group of alcoholics stumbling down the street, or a pack of horny johns in a "Pride" march would.

I certainly wouldn't challenge their right to promote their lifestyle, it is constitutionally guaranteed, but for the life of me I just don't get it.



To: Dayuhan who wrote (31060)2/17/1999 5:44:00 PM
From: Jacques Chitte  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
>Does the Constitution guarantee the right to be an asshole?<

Y'know - probably! At the same time - it does not suggest that being an asshole is a good thing. The Constitution further guarantees the rest of us to completely ignore the asshole.

Imo there is a big diff between a right and a duty.