Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mooter775 who wrote (8482)	2/18/1999 11:51:00 AM
From: john t. brice	Respond to of 27311

Mooter> I agree 150%, as far as licensing if it were up to me, I would let the liquid guys in because they are not in direct competition. However, on the solid side I would handle it much like Intel did ten years ago, sorry this is ours and we're going to be the one to manufacture it. duckster

To: mooter775 who wrote (8482)	2/18/1999 11:56:00 AM
From: lws	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

Hi, Mooter, I concur about the importance of the licensing -- wrote my post before I saw your's. Your "raising the bar" is interesting too, but I have no sense of the numbers. Where does the 170-180 number come from? Regards, lws

To: mooter775 who wrote (8482)	2/18/1999 1:30:00 PM
From: P. Ramamoorthy	Respond to of 27311

mooter775 - Re.:"...able to license this technology to existing li-ion participants..." Great news! It has opened up a potential licensing revenue for the next 20 years. The key word here is "SAFETY". The news release not only boosts investor confidence and stock price, but also tells potential end users (OEM's) about the "safety" advantage their patent brings to the current Li ion cathode technology. Great sales pitch supported by patent news! Ram