Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCH Technologies (DCH) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alan Brezin who wrote (626)	2/19/1999 5:31:00 AM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2513

>>Sid. Making unsupported statements on the web..<< Hey, it's not just unsupported, what he said is plain false, and possibly more clearly so than the Clinton lies that polls show cause some 84% of Americans to believe he is guilty of both crimes as charged. Well, as you've seen, Steve O'Shinsky has revealed all the Characters, Uncle and Son. What a relief! Why Sid plainly falsely states that H2OShinsky admits he is Dr. Harvey in a post where H2Oshinsky clearly puts a name to Dr. Harvey that is not his own, is curious indeed. Questions as to motive for Sid's bashing are well stated elsewhere near this post. Sid's financial questions are worthy. Yes, "we"(god knows I'm reluctant to post let alone be part of a "we" here) or someone should do as Sid AND Mr. Oshinsky both suggest- and seek answers. I'm enticed by this outfit. What can I say? Sid did not respond to my post to him. Oshinsky not only responded even though it wasn't directed to him- he also corrected my false positive notion that Cabot made DCHT it's stock of the year...and then I think, hey, if all these big names in Tech. and industry are thrown about falsely in DCHT's name, then why not let Cabot slip in there too while you are at it? Could a scam of such grandiose nature long survive without soon being fingered by those with which it claims various associations? For the sake of Drama, I'm willing to unreasonably assume for now that all the DCHT information is real. It's the future prospects that are of greater concern. When Mr. Oshinsky says no one should worry about DCHT running out of money, who here can say what is what with that? Yet while I'm busy unreasonably assuming all the DCHT information is real, I have to naively imagine that just maybe among the smallfry outfits involved directly and indirectly, past and present ...just maybe one or two of them might like to help if need be. But I am naive. Perhaps these associations are meaningless. Perhaps DCHT got this Tech. only because everyone else knows it to be worthless? Maybe everyone involved is simply duped by DCHT into looking into false promise?:-) Maybe! I know that if DCHT fuel cells don't work then no airplanes that interest Burt Rutan will fly with them aboard... and if they work but can't be manufactured as readily and cost effectively as suggested by DCHT then no fuel cell product from DCHT will sell much volume this year or any year. I know that if the sensors aren't as unique and special as claimed then no Westinghouse affilliate will install them in nukes all over the world, and no BB hopeful bridge inspection outfit will likely win a job bid using them- ever. I do have a notion from personal experience as to how lucrative the inspection business can be if you can just get a job! So too, I know that further research into that BB could well be worthwhile if the use of DCHT sensors will give them an inspection edge over the competition(assuming there are jobs to bid- JEEZ)! Goodmorning, Dan B