SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (951)2/20/1999 11:48:00 AM
From: Terry J. Crebs  Read Replies (6) | Respond to of 5821
 
Very observant Elizabeth. << Does this have some bearing on where we are in the cumulate system? Or is it that the Lac Rocher mineralization has been moved about by tectonics? Is this a negative thing? Or what? >> Yes; yes; probably; the mineralization is metamorphosed (host rock looks like amphibolite) and massive sulfides are full of pyrite veins. My reports suggest a "cooked" Archean deposit with probable remobilization. Be careful, according to the new webpage images #99-1 mineralization does not yield IP, Mag, or Input geophysical anomalies--this implies lack of volume; I'll be surprised if even a respectable (but uneconomic) 2 MMT. Also the "stall" is worrisome--sheesh, they could have put in 3-4 holes to follow up on 99-1, instead they build a winter road?? Could mean someone is hesistant about spotting the follow-up holes. Good Luck and Best Regards, T.



To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (951)2/20/1999 5:52:00 PM
From: dave brown  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5821
 
Don't really know yet. Pt:Pd, Pt/Pd:Cu ratios change within hole 99-1 also. Would like to see more data before drawing any conclusion. I tend to agree with Terry's comments. My guts telling me a 3-5 million ton deposit, but sure would like Nuinsco to prove me wrong.