Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ISOMAN who wrote (26191)	2/19/1999 10:21:00 PM
From: jhild	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 43774

So what are you saying then? Is the stock going to still be 1.7&cent's after they reorganize the shares say 300:1?

To: ISOMAN who wrote (26191)	2/19/1999 10:28:00 PM
From: JCNelson	Respond to of 43774

isoman,I don't post alot but I have to tell you friend that was one of the best post I have read in a long time. I think if people would read and let it sink in they would have a bigger picture of these OTC stocks. Any of these stocks can make you a winner or a loser but if I lose money in a stock it's because I picked it, not because I bought because of a pumper talking me in to it. Just my thoughts,I hope you do not mine me posting.... JCNelson

To: ISOMAN who wrote (26191)	2/20/1999 7:18:00 AM
From: snipper	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

sure like your attitude isoman,but don't you think it is fair for anyone to post their thots,pro or con here with out getting bashed over the head by those with a different view? if that was to happen, the price would still be 1.7 cents .snipper.

To: ISOMAN who wrote (26191)	2/20/1999 10:13:00 AM
From: ColleenB	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 43774

Why do you feel a need to tell me how I am feeling, when you don't know the first thing about me. You say it in a much nicer way than JT does, but that still does not make it so. Why do the longs have a need to bash me because I am questioning PRWT management? Seems to me y'all are the ones filled with anger. Just read your posts. Mine are not filled with such language, or harassing over tones, yet you tell me I am angry. It is silly for you to request that my brother come back to the thread and ask him for answers. He does not work for PRWT, now or ever. I am not asking an investor for answers to questions I have about PRWT. I am posting the information. I want the lies and rumors to stop. I want us to be able to look at the FACTS, and separate them from our hopes and dreams. This charade has gone on long enough. All the pretense has not gotten the price any higher so, why is everybody fighting so hard to hide the truth? The ugly truth is PRWT has lied to us, and has done so for months. Many issues and PRs that we based our investment on have turned out to be falsehoods. We were told in July that the RM was completed in a PR, we now know this did not happen then, and are unsure if it has even happened to date. We were told in a PR that they had government backed loans in Belize. This has been proven to be false, also. The list of lies and misrepresentations are endless. But yet, investors stand by PRWT like gullible sheep waiting to be fleeced, over and over again. And how do the investors react? They attack anybody who questions their beloved PRWT. They verbally abuse and harass any person willing to sift through the lies and rumors and examine what is verifiable. They post personal information about them and feel it's justified, when it is not. You once told me in a PM that you would like to help newbies, to empower them with information so that they are an informed investor. Yet, you encourage the people on this thread to harass an investor who does not see PRWT as anything other than pyrite. You no longer harass Rosie, but you were shameless at one point and you were one of the instigators to start this behavior on PRWT, one which has blossomed and consumed the thread. And your current silence is seen by these people as your continued approval. Everything you are asking now, he was responsible for diseminating back then. so, you want to lay the blame on an investor rather than the company? Think about it.

To: ISOMAN who wrote (26191)	2/20/1999 10:17:00 AM
From: wonk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

isoman: A year ago, I didn't know the difference between OTC-BB and NASDAQ or any other reputable exchange, notwithstanding the fact that I should have known. I learned - and thankfully lost no money - because I look before I leap, and because there were people who helped me with my lessons. Your post can be summarized in the pumper's mantra "Do your own DD." Of course we all are responsible for our own investing decisions but that does not absolve the pumpers from responsibility for their activities which straddle the line of criminality, and many times cross over that line. There is no proportionality in your post. Yes, if I walk up to a street vendor's table and lose money on a game of "hide the pea," its my fault for placing my money on the table. However, the game was still illegal and con artist running the game still deserves to go to jail. Perhaps, if a policeman was around, the street vendor never would have set up the game and therefore I would not have been tempted to play and to lose my money. Perhaps if a friend, or just someone I respect, had been nearby they would have warned me off. Then, there would be no crying over spilt milk, and the "official" police would not have to clean up the mess after the a fact. ...Yet it is not our part to master all the tides of the world, but to do what is in us for the succour of those years wherein we are set, uprooting the evil in the fields that we know, so that those who live after may have clean earth to till. What weather they shall have is not ours to rule.... ww