SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (34610)2/20/1999 2:46:00 AM
From: Wildstar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
So what if it was true? I know that all the facts aren't all in right now, but suppose you see her NBC interview, and she appears credible. What do we do? Should we just forget about it, since we just finished with the impeachment trial?

OTOH, I agree with you, why didn't Starr put this into the report?



To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (34610)2/20/1999 3:31:00 AM
From: JBL  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 67261
 
<Gee; why did the Republican's sit on this till after the impeachment?????? Man that is the question!!!!!!! They had it after all. Why why why??????>

Because Clinton was impeached for perjury and obstruction of justice, not rape.


If Broadderick's rape accusations are already known by a majority of Americans, why is the Washington Post treating it as news on its front page ?

Please try using logic in your answer.




HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News