Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : CYBERIAN GULAG + other thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (137)	2/20/1999 10:16:00 PM
From: ztect	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 193

If a gun was used w/o a silencer, wouldn't the neighbors have heard? Wouldn't this have clearly established a time line, and wasn't the time line an issue? If a gun was used wouldn't this also have left behind shell casings and bullets ie. ballistics as evidence to be matched to a type of gun and couldn't this have conceivably been easier to trace? Why the questions? Seems to me that if the murderer were either an estranged lover like OJ or "drug lords" or whomever, the logical choice of murder weapon would be a knife regardless of the motivation because a knife is silent and leaves behind no evidence. Anyway any idea regarding the "glove"...here were my preceding questions....any insights? What about the glove? Why no corresponding tear in the glove, that I know of, where his finger was cut? PLus why would a tight fitting glove fall off or be taken off since the purpose of gloves is to NOT leave finger prints? Maybe I just missed this evidence. Plus were the shoe prints definitely linked to OJ and were these the shoes he was seen wearing in the sideline photograph....can't recall the particulars, but I believe I remember there was some debate over the "bloody foot print" evidence. Again my questions are neither intended to indict or exonerate... These were just questions to me that I hadn't and haven't heard answered ...that's all. Therefore, I still don't have an opinion and let prevailing sentiment as shaped by the media form conclusions for me. Plus do you have any opinion or words to add regarding the divergent perception amongst the black and white communities on this OJ trial? z (spelling not checked)

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (137)	2/20/1999 11:29:00 PM
From: Victor Lazlo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 193

How did OJ Simpson's footprints in the blood get at the crime scene? Did the evil cops carry OJ there and make him walk around, while half the LA police force watched? Why did OJ flee his arrest warrant, in the slow-speed chase, with a disguise, a passport, a gun, and $10,000 in cash? Not the actions of an innocent person. Where was OJ at the time of the murders? His time was never adequately accounted for, and the driver of the hired car who arrived at OJ's home to drive him to the airport had to wait for OJ to show up. I would never claim the investigation of this crime was without flaw. No crime investigation is. What I would say is that it is silly to bend over backwards to conjure up conpiracy theories agains poor OJ, given the preponderance of evidence that points to only one person. Don't forget, OJ had a $250,000 per month motive to kill Nicole. Not to mention how she was sleeping around; that would rile any guy. Remember the tape of Nicole's 911 call? OJ bashing his way into her house and yelling obscenties at her? It was not the first 911 call she had made re OJ. Given how obvious it was that OJ was capable of serious violence, I'll never understand why Nicole did not get video security cameras installed at her home and grounds. That would have caught OJ on tape. Victor