Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : CYBERIAN GULAG + other thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (154)	2/21/1999 2:30:00 PM
From: Victor Lazlo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 193

<< bit I will add I don't remember that they were ever proven to be OJ's.>> True, Sidney, they were'nt, beyond circumstantial match. <<You did not bring this up before either; but why would she do that and have her doorstep drug deals taped? I don't think the drug dealers would appreciate that BTW.>> You're right- the one about the vt security was new. And I had not thought about the dd getting on tape! good point <g> But was it really her mo to transact the deals at her home? <<But every guy who is paying alimony or has life insurance on his spouse then has a motive. It proves nothing IMO. >> It's not just financial. Whenever a woman is killed the first line of potential suspects is always boyfriends, husbands, fmr boyfriends, and fmr husbands. That's because usually murder victims are killed by people they know. "crimes of passion" ... Victor