Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Systems, Strategies and Resources for Trading Futures -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stoctrash who wrote (16337)	2/22/1999 8:49:00 PM
From: Patrick Slevin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44573

<The Quick and the Dead> Although I look at the quote from a different perspective it helps me more than you might think. Thursday, the action was whipping back and forth so much it seemed that it had to be the setup, that Tom was correct but that most likely the eventual resolution was up. "quick and dead", "elephant dance", whichever works. but as I am certain Tom is probably Long at this point it surprises me that although GZ and I thought it would be unlikely to get a consensus on direction it is relatively startling that probably most of us came to the same conclusion at about the same time. I think Tom's system, from what I have seen of it, would most likely have gone Long late morning, mid-day Friday. Your stuff seems to be somewhat biased Long. Scott, Nemer are looking at Longs. Even with a nick like Bear King he was Long from Thursday. The rest of the people here seem predisposed to Long. Well, this is not going to last (our relative agreement) so it may as well be enjoyed for the moment. Even the Orange Juice King shucked his putz. This may all be unprecedented. It's a good thing that I don't use SI opinion as a contrary indicator, I would be getting a bit nervous.