SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Globalstar Telecommunications Limited GSAT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (3079)2/23/1999 12:58:00 AM
From: djane  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 29987
 
ING Barings conference call summaries (from yahoo thread)
___________________________________________________________

Top:Business and
Finance:Stocks:Services:Communications Services:GSTRF
(Globalstar Telecommun.)

G* Break-Even Point
by: SafetyAgentMan (M/Aptos, CA)
4283 of 4292
During the conference call Rob Kaimowitz from ING Barings estimated the
break-even point for G* at 14 cents per minute. Bernard Schwartz corrected
him by saying he was heading in the right direction, but the amount was even
lower.
IRIDF's break even point is around 1.40 per minute.

Posted: Feb 22 1999 7:41PM EST as a reply to: Msg 1 by YahooFinance

___________________________________________________

Top:Business and
Finance:Stocks:Services:Communications Services:GSTRF
(Globalstar Telecommun.)


Re: G* Breakeven and other
Conference Call news
by: Alsoready2Bwealthy (50/M/Orlando, FL)
4289 of 4292
Great conference call link.

I listened to the entire thing and took notes. The main purpose of the call was to
highlight the difference in the business plans of G* and ICO (similar) to IRIDF.
IRIDF is in danger of loan default and the street is worried about all Sat
businesses. Spin control for the current stock linkage and damage. I think they
did hit great home run with the storyline.

Too much to detail completely here but the main points are that G*'s max
capacity is more like 12 Billion minutes/yr and the breakeven is at about 220,000
subscribers (for on-going cash flow expenses). For complete G*1 debt paydown
and financing the construction of G*2 it will take 1 Million subscribers to
breakeven.


IRIDF has 1.5 B/yr, ICO has 5 B/yr.
ICO has similar breakeven cost (~.23/minute)
G* is "High single digit cents" (less than the reported $.14-.21 by ING)
according to BS

IRIDF is at about $1.40/min breakeven. (They may never make it.)

IRIDF came to market first but too quickly. Could not test until the entire system
was on-orbit.

World Phone retail (currently at 1.50 to 2.00/minute) will set the price point. Sat
service can command a premium in some situations.

G* is looking for up to 7.5 million subscribers with G*1. All systems (IRIDF,
ICO and G*) can do will in certain areas of the world but G* has the partners to
do the best in the most places.

Target market is not urban telcoms it is first of all "Regional Roaming",
connectivity in the areas just beyond the reach of urban networks. Second
market is unserved mobile. Third market is unserved fixed sites.

BS allowed to a question that G* will eventually also contain GEO sat service
(but not tomorrow!) to expand the service for fixed sites and help to lower the
price/minute.

Interesting discussion on "Universal Access Mandates". Apparently some
countries are passing laws to place taxes on local telcos (~2% of POTS revenue)
to fund subsidies to help pay for rural phone service in the country. G* looks to
cash in by supplying the phones paid by the government subsidy funds. (and
cutting in the local Telcos on the action.)
Sounds win-win to me.

Some discussion that some vendors (Vodaphone) may sell the G* handsets
cheap ($50) + a contract for minutes for selected customers.
This subsidy is up
to the retail partners. Retail price will start in the $850-$1100 range and could go
as low as $500 in large production runs.

G* will need to finance $550M to get to full revenue. Expect a note financing
later in the year. LOR has $600-$700M in general corporate cash now and
stands behind the venture.

Posted: Feb 22 1999 10:57PM EST as a reply to: Msg 4283 by SafetyAgentMan

______________________________________________________________

Top:Business and
Finance:Stocks:Services:Communications Services:GSTRF
(Globalstar Telecommun.)


More On ING Barings Conference
Call
by: bbigtim
4287 of 4292
Hi Safety! I just listened to the conference call and found it very reassuring. The
$1.40 per minute break even point for IRIDF is based on the assumption that all
available capacity
(1 1/2 billion minutes per year) is utilized, so the real break even point will be
considerably higher. The analyst pointed out that Omnipoint Worldphone already
offers satellite service at about $1.50 per minute. I know that the IRIDF phones
will be smaller and easier to use, but its hard to see how they are going to be able
to serve anyone but global high-rollers who want one phone that will work
everywhere and will pay a high premium for the privilege. In contrast, under
contracts already in place Globalstar will charge its coooperating companies
approximately $.47 per minute on a wholesale basis, which they can resell for
any price they like (suggested retail is $.65 per minute).
This will be quite
reasonable for people who want local roaming in areas without adequate cellular
build-out and fixed service in areas without land-based infrastructure
(Globalstar's target markets). The share price for GSTRF will be adversely
impacted in the short-term by IRIDF's difficulties, but I remain confident that,
unlike IRIDF, GSTRF will be very profitable.

Posted: Feb 22 1999 9:53PM EST as a reply to: Msg 4283 by SafetyAgentMan



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (3079)2/24/1999 12:47:00 AM
From: djane  Respond to of 29987
 
WSJ. China Deals Blow to Qualcomm, Others, Halting Plans to Adopt Phone Standard

February 24, 1999

Tech Center

By WAYNE ARNOLD
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

China has suspended plans to adopt a controversial U.S. cellular telephone
technology, dealing a potentially major blow to the technology's chief
proponent, Qualcomm Inc., and other U.S. telecommunications
companies.

Chinese officials and foreign cellular telephone executives in China say
Beijing has imposed a moratorium on the spread of CDMA cellular
technology for now, fearing the technology will soon be obsolete. CDMA,
or code division multiple access, was first commercialized by Qualcomm
and is the cellular-telephone standard widely used in the U.S.

"If we introduce another new network, we would need billions [of dollars]
in investment," said an official from China Telecom, the state-owned
telecommunications giant that dominates China's cellular telephone
industry.

Instead, China is pushing forward with the more popular European
standard called GSM, for global system for mobile communications. China
hopes that by keeping the nation on one standard, it can more quickly and
cheaply upgrade to GSM's successor, now being developed by cellular
manufacturers Telefon AB L.M. Ericsson of Sweden, Nokia Corp. of
Finland and Japanese cellular operator NTT Mobile Communications
Networks Inc. That technology, known as wideband-CDMA, or
WCDMA, is scheduled to make its debut in Japan in early 2001. China is
eager to use the much-broader capacity of WCDMA to open China's
increasingly crowded cellular networks, Chinese telecommunications
officials say.

Political Fray

China has become a key part of an increasingly political debate over
whether WCDMA should serve as a global cellular standard. Operators
and manufacturers are anxious to see the development of a technology that
would eliminate the wireless world's borders, which currently prevent a
phone from Japan, for example, being used in the U.S. The largest cellular
telephone operator in South Korea, one of the world's few sizable markets
for CDMA, is already considering adopting WCDMA so that Koreans
can use their phones in Japan during soccer's World Cup, to be held there
in 2002. "It's not only about China, it's a world-wide issue," said a
China-based executive at a U.S. telecommunications company who asked
not to be named.

Rumors have circulated since last October that Beijing had turned away
from CDMA because China Telecom, a former monopoly controlled by
China's Ministry of Information Industry, already has more than 17 million
GSM subscribers. The technology has also suffered from the waning
commercial influence of China's military, which had plans to build CDMA
networks, but last year was ordered to sever all business ties. "It's a Catch
22," said Michael Wallace, head of Qualcomm's consumer-products
business for Asia, describing how China's cellular policies reflect China
Telecom's commercial interests.

A moratorium is clearly bad news for San Diego-based Qualcomm,
whose founder Irwin Jacobs has personally lobbied Beijing to adopt the
technology. China is one of the world's fastest-growing markets for cellular
equipment; China's Ministry of Information Industry predicts the number of
mobile-phone users will grow to nearly 40 million this year from 25 million
in 1998. Other American companies, including Motorola Inc. and Lucent
Technologies Inc., also sell CDMA equipment in China.

Warning Issued

Qualcomm's complaint that government resistance to CDMA is a
protectionist measure has prompted Washington to warn European
countries against adopting WCDMA without accommodating Qualcomm's
CDMA. Adoption of CDMA also will be a key issue on the agenda when
Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji travels to the U.S. later this year. "We believe
that consumers should decide what technology she or he wants to use, not
the government," says a U.S. government official.

But industry executives say China's move makes sense from both a
technological and financial standpoint. "Why would you let anyone in your
country waste money on a technology from some company in California
that everyone is trying to get rid of?" asks Richard Siemens, chairman of
Hong Kong cellular company Distacom Communications Ltd.

GSM networks already crisscross China's major urban centers, enabling
GSM customers to use their phones nationwide, something even U.S.
operators, with their plethora of technological standards, are only just
beginning to offer. Such blanket coverage, industry experts say, presents a
huge marketing hurdle to newcomers with more sporadic coverage. GSM
also offers more extensive world-wide coverage than CDMA, meaning the
growing number of Chinese who travel abroad are able to carry their
mobile phones with them. Fledgling CDMA networks offering only local
service have a hard time competing.

Chinese telecommunications company Great Wall has already installed four
trial CDMA networks in Beijing, Guangzhou, Shanghai and Xian. The
company won't comment on what will become of those networks now.
The only other plans to adopt CDMA belonged to China Telecom rival
China Unicom, which was going to build CDMA networks near Shanghai,
Guangzhou and Tianjin. Unicom has suspended those plans, a company
spokesman said.

Return to top of page | Format for printing

Copyright © 1999 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.




To: Maurice Winn who wrote (3079)2/24/1999 12:52:00 AM
From: djane  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29987
 
Maurice, the China decision on CDMA is confusing. I thought China Telecom was a G* partner. Does it impact G* with its dual-mode phones anyway?