Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (35131)	2/23/1999 8:22:00 AM
From: MacCoy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Sorry if I missd something; I'd included it in Brees, where I suggested the opposite pole--that maybe you don't think self-defense is a legitimate justification for actions? No, I think I am using this in standard context--an INNOCENT man protecting himself from an outside force meaning to do him harm. Clinton's innocence before the court was proven two ways--by the judge's final immaterial ruling, and by the Starr investigation. Being innocent, BC can call upon the self-defense defense. I think I've intimated across several posts, if not to you, that I think this is a hell of a way to run a court system. Clinton should not bear the cost of pointing out a faulty place in the system. Punishing him won't fix it.