Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (35345)	2/23/1999 5:52:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Now translate that into moron and repost it. Maybe then she'll understand it. JLA

To: Neocon who wrote (35345)	2/23/1999 6:01:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 67261

And this response has exactly what to do with Michaels post? Answer: nothing. You either agree with what he said or you don't. Do you feel that a family depending on you "brings out the best in you"? As far as insulting you or your wife, let me be the first to apologize - NOT. Unless of course you would like to apologize to ME and all of my associates for comparing us and our substantial contributions to your fortunes (if you have ever invested in technology) with every females ability to bear children. Yes indeed, and Thomas Pynchon is only as good as his sperm count too. Lets see, Bill Gates has fathered 2 children now so that means hes about as worthwhile of an individual as say, Geraldo Rivera?

To: Neocon who wrote (35345)	2/23/1999 10:06:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Hey Neocon. By no means did I say anything of the sort, and I hardly think Micheal believes women are valued only for their looks and how good they are in bed. The point he likely tried to make is that whereas men often judge one another on very simple, I think somewhat shallow, terms ("How big was that tiger you killed?"), women are more often judged on who they are and what they think ("What do you think about life, family, work, play, education, religion, racism, love, sex, happiness, the meaning of life? What are your dreams? How are your children? What do you think about parenting? What did you think of that book?"). I think Micheal is correct. I am not much into the 90's sensitive man thing - men crying all over the place to try and show how sensitive they are. Nevertheless, I would that men would generally become a bit more like women than men in the area upon which Michael has commented. Michelle is grossly misrepresenting my views, and I find this unfortunate. She is hurting very much about something. I would like to help, but alas I find the divide too great. (off to bed. Been a long day. Fairly productive. I think I will take tomorrow off and rest a bit.)