SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Donahoe who wrote (42108)2/23/1999 11:08:00 PM
From: KeepItSimple  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 164684
 
>Totally focused on aggregating as many customers as fast as possible.

So was Boston Chicken. Oops, I mean BOSTQ.

Just increase those revenues and get more customers in the door! Who cares if we don't turn a profit, we'll make it up in volume!!

Amazon is worse than a low-margin retailer. They are a NEGATIVE-margin retailer. They are simply burning the junk bond debt to subsidize cheap books for all their customers. Perhaps they should apply for tax-free charity status? Ooops, they are already tax-free, since they've never earned a dime.



To: John Donahoe who wrote (42108)2/23/1999 11:19:00 PM
From: larry oertel  Respond to of 164684
 
What Landis Likes-Street.com

While Landis has long preferred to play the Internet from the ground up, investing in "infrastructure" companies such as Cisco (CSCO:Nasdaq) and Texas Instruments (TXN:NYSE), he did buy America Online (AOL:NYSE) last summer for his $50 million Technology Leaders fund "immediately after, it announced the Netscape (NSCP:Nasdaq) deal," he said.

The manager said the Internet service firm has demonstrated its ability to keep customers loyal, unlike online retailer Amazon.com (AMZN:Nasdaq), which Landis said has so far failed to convince him it possesses an "enduring competitive advantage."

Landis' $150 million Technology Value fund is up 24.5% over the past 12 months; Technology Leaders is up 74.9% in the same time period, according to Lipper.
thestreet.com



To: John Donahoe who wrote (42108)2/24/1999 8:23:00 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Yes. I think 2000M in 99 is doable. Amazon is on a tear. Totally focused on aggregating
as many customers as fast as possible.


John,

Let's say AMZN does $2 billion in 1999 or even $3 billion. How will that benefit them from a profit and loss point of view?

Glenn