Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (35404)	2/24/1999 2:14:00 AM
From: JBL	Respond to of 67261

<I don't think anybody can rape 300 women and get away with it,> Please Michelle, Can you try to be objective ? May be just a little bit ? Do you realize the effect of the above comments on your credibility ? Did anybody ever claim that Clinton raped all the women he slept with ? How about this scenario : Clinton is a very talented and powerful man, full of charm, but a fantastic liar, a womanizer, who sometimes cannot take "no" for an answer, and who at times, can sexually harass, assault, or even sometimes rape the women that resist him ? Is that really so unbelievable in light of what we know now ? No, in fact, it fits the pattern pretty well, and I believe Broaddrick more than I believe Clinton or his $ 500 an hour attorney. And whatever you may say, I am not in this to hurt Democrats or liberals. I want however people to see Clinton for what he really is, because smart and corrupt folks like him are a cancer for our society. You think nobody will go after him when he is out of office. Just watch.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (35404)	2/24/1999 8:57:00 AM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Michele,>>> The republicans have been acting like the sex police and even more scary,<<< There is no doubt there are republicans, republicans with some degree of power, who will act in ways that offend law abiding and enlightened citizens just as there are democrats that will behave in similar fashion (more or less in number - who cares). But what does that have to do with Bill Clinton and his behavior? Because there are people that break the law and act in thugish manner, does that allow Clinton to do anything he wants? By your logic, does it mean that if you commit a crime and if you get a bigger criminal to level charges at you, you can then declare yourself innocent - or less guilty ? The problem with your Mike Tyson analogy is that Mike Tyson is not as cunning and as smart as Bill Clinton and he cannnot use law enforcement resources to further his need for immature and possibly criminal behavior in persuit of sex. Which one of these two people is more dangerous to civil society? Regards, Mary