Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael L. Voorhees who wrote (14461)	2/25/1999 9:56:00 AM
From: JDN	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 64865

to all: take a look at this release. I am not an attorney but I CANT BELIEVE it is legal to ask a company to divulge its FUTURE business plans?? Lawyers anyone? JDN Microsoft subpoenas AOL, Sun, Netscape on ties NEW YORK, Feb 24 (Reuters) - Microsoft Corp. has subpoenaed America Online Inc. <AOL.N>, Netscape Communications Corp. <NSCP.O> and Sun Microsystems Inc. <SUNW.O> asking the three to produce information on their present ties and future business plans, officials at the three companies said on Wednesday. Jim Whitney, a spokesman for America Online, said Microsoft had contacted it on Feb. 15 with a demand that it turn over documents Microsoft has been seeking to defend itself in the government antitrust case being lodged against it. A Microsoft spokesman said it had subpoenaed documents from the three companies to determine the effect of the agreements on competition, which is an issue in its trial. Last November, America Online agreed to buy Netscape Communications for $4.2 billion in a three-way deal, in which Sun will resell Netscape's enterprise software and provide servers that manage networks to America Online. Sun spokeswoman Lisa Poulson said Sun received a subpoena last week regarding its role in the AOL-Netscape merger. Previously, Sun had voluntarily given the U.S. Department of Justice partially redacted copies of its six contracts with AOL so that the DOJ could share the documents with Microsoft. The subpoena followed, Poulson said. "From our perspective, we delivered the relevant contracts without a subpoena, and we're willing to and have been working to deliver whatever other information is appropriate to Microsoft in a timely manner," Poulson said in a statement. Sun and AOL said they have been working with Microsoft on meeting the Redmond, Wash.-based company's requests, while also seeking to protect their ability to withhold competitive information that might be used against them. The companies said they expect the issues raised by the subpoenas to be resolved by the end of this week. Poulson said the subpoena Sun received asks for documents concerning the effect of Sun's deal and its related agreements on Microsoft, operating systems, middleware, Web browsing software and any other software development platforms. It also asks for documents related to the creation and distribution of Web browsing software, the number of subscribers to online services and estimates of traffic to the companies Web sites and any documents mentioning the deal's possible affect on the U.S. versus Microsoft lawsuit. The request for information extends to documents tied to communications among AOL, International Business Machines Corp. and its Lotus unit, Novell Inc. and Oracle Corp., who collectively amount to most of Microsoft's major rivals. It also requests documents tied to AOL's decision to continue to use Microsoft's Internet Explorer as the primary browser in its AOL service and any information related to the possibility of using Netscape or Sun Web browsing software in any future AOL service software. This information was to be returned to Microsoft by February 22. The Sun spokeswoman said Sun had delivered a good portion of the materials, and was negotiating with Microsoft's attorneys at the lawfirm of Sullivan and Cromwell on what else might be appropriate to search for and deliver.

To: Michael L. Voorhees who wrote (14461)	2/25/1999 6:40:00 PM
From: JC Jaros	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 64865

Here's a notable news item from Rusty (the human link) Johnson on the Linux thread. I've caught a couple of posts here and there from smaller system integrators regarding putting together what amounts to Ultra clones with options to replace Sun graphics with Matrox, etc. This would seem to give Ultra IIi an distinct price/performance advantage over Intel offerings for the Linux user. $2,000 Ultra 10 clones, anyone? SUN TEAMS WITH LINUX COMMUNITY ... TO BRING ULTRASPARC PROCESSOR BOARD TO LINUX SYSTEM INTEGRATORS Initiative To Bring Popular Operating Environment To Internet Service Provider Market sun.com