Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (35500)	2/24/1999 9:14:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

She seemed personally credible to me and her story is backed up by a number of witnesses who she spoke to contemporaneous with the alleged rape. JLA

To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (35500)	2/24/1999 10:04:00 PM
From: JBL	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 67261

YOU ARE SUCH A DEMENTED PIECE OF SHIT JONATHAN. YOU MAKE ME SICK.

To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (35500)	2/24/1999 10:48:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

>Then her friend rides her home and doesn't even suggest going to the police???? You watch her and she starts crying and then the next question is posed and she suddenly isn't crying anymore????< Put yourself in her shoes. You really should read about the goings on in Arkansas. Put yourself in the woman's shoes. Now consider her principles, which I think are generally the principles of all America, unfortunately. Clinton was the AG, for Pete's sake, and likely to rise to governor. You simply cannot expect a little adulterous funeral home director to go waltzing in to the police about this thing. She knew that if the system would not eat her alive, the truth about her affair would. She knew back then she would have been ruined in every way. She had a whole lot more to lose than did Anita Hill. Her allegations are whole lot more substantial also. Your words are more appropriate for Hill. You should spare them for all the women Clinton has likely abused. Have you no mercy man? My word!

To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (35500)	2/25/1999 1:10:00 AM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 67261

Johnathan, this is deep- end stuff...

To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (35500)	2/25/1999 1:13:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

It was nice of her to say she isn't interested in sueing Clinton considering that the statute of limitations has already run. I wouldn't be too sure about that, bubba. You're obviously not a lawyer. At least not an employed one.

To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (35500)	2/25/1999 12:35:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 67261

>>You watch her and she starts crying and then the next question is posed and she suddenly isn't crying anymore????<<< What a friggin' idiot you are.......that interview was edited down from 5 Hours of questioning by Lisa Meyers. Tim Russert saw the entire thing, not the "sanitized" version we got last night, he said he was physically ill after seeing it. I think he knows beyond any reasonable doubt that we have sexual predator and criminal in the WH and there's not a goddam thing anyone will ever do about it. Whenever I see Clinton's face on the tube I just want to puke. bp