Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (35779)	2/25/1999 5:41:00 PM
From: Brad Bolen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

RE: I don't know of a single fiscal conservative that doesn't recognize the necessity the use of "public" funds ---- I think you are mixing apples and oranges. I.E. Sure some conservatives believe in use of public funds, but for what? And local control? Another issue. But a fundamental difference in philosophy which I am sure we are both already well aware of. Under that ideology, poorer communities don't get things like quality arts, education, streets, et.al. Some philosophies feel that the better we ALL are (in some areas, at least) areas, the better off we ALL are. It always comes back to the same thing: If you can afford it, you can have it. Otherwise...SOL Anyway... Ever read any Samuel Lipman? B.

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (35779)	2/25/1999 5:44:00 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

How can you justify taking money from someone in Arizona to build a museum in Connecticut? Not to mention the fact that 50 cents of every dollar leaks away by the time it gets there.