SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gerald R. Lampton who wrote (22777)2/26/1999 4:02:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24154
 
Gerald, I'd quit keeping tabs on Mary Jo Foley when I got distracted with other things. I still don't understand this throwing the trial thing, they could just quit calling witnesses if that's what they wanted to do. If they hadn't mounted any defense at all, and just said the government hadn't proven its case, wouldn't they be better off on appeal? They'd certainly look better from a "hearts and minds" viewpoint.

Anyway, I had to throw in this reader's comment, from a random sampling of what came in after that article.

DOJ Barely scrathced the surface. And that is why I believe MS is simply "throwing in the towel." As a one time contract worker at MS, I was privy to numerous docs which detailed who couldn't get pre-release code (specifically Windows 98 and Windows CE). They call it the NPR list and I think MS knew with all the dirt being thrown on them, that the denials were only making the DOJ dig deeper and sooner than later these docs would surface. (http://www.zdnet.com/talkback/22_29622_121334.html)

I wouldn't know, but I do wish Boies had asked Kempin about Vobis. But, I also wish Microsoft would ship an OS that sucked less.

Cheers, Dan.



To: Gerald R. Lampton who wrote (22777)2/27/1999 3:19:00 PM
From: Bearded One  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24154
 
I think I've seen that type of defense used in sitcoms. Pray tell, what sort of mistake could the DOJ make? And suppose they do make some mistakes---would that actually cause a reversal? This is no police-setup drug bust where someone forgets to read someone their rights in their native Spanish, after all.