To: stockman_scott who wrote (105204 ) 2/26/1999 9:31:00 AM From: Sig Respond to of 176387
>>>>and you can read my extensive comments that I made to "a Gorilla & King Investing Thread">>> Thats one of the best written discussions of Dell I've ever seen. One that says "Gee, I wish I could have said that". I hesitate to post some of my own observations on Dell because I was trained as an engineer and therefore tend to get "lost in the details" at times. Where we get off track a bit, on this "future stock price" thread is to assume that Dell is basically in business for the money which is only a part of the game, where the profits and growth we enjoy is the RESULT of what may best be summed as a business model.(Which others now recognize as having a certain value(hehehe) But those who copy it are chasing a moving target (G) To become as efficient as Dell a company nearly has to begin from scratch. Take Sears, for example: My weed eater failed and I needed a part. Called the parts warehouse after searching phone book for number. Ordered two small parts to arrive in a week or ten days, or up to several weeks. One came in a week, the other in 3 weeks during which I could not use the weedeater. Cost 1/3 of what I paid for the weedeater. There is a whole system and attitude in place behind this ' slow as molasses in January" service. Warehouse locations, arrangements with foreign suppliers, divisional assignments, inventory control ( or lack of). And unknown stocks of obsolete parts laying around in (possibly misplaced) warehouses(HEHE). OK. So Sears now goes direct with the Web, but those parts are are still going to arrive in 3 weeks or thereabouts, perhaps. Summary: Thanks for the great post. CPQ has lots of problems solve to be efficient , despite their efforts to go direct. Go Mikie. Sig