SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (105364)2/26/1999 1:38:00 PM
From: JRI  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
Chuzz- As you were writing your post on the Dell thread...I was posting the EXACT same question on the Compaq thread....to a salesman from a VAR (Bretsky)....

Great minds...

Yes, this definitely puts things in a different light (perhaps)...remember..the big thrust of Dell's downward slide has been ("the others are catching up!")...if the (nuetral/bearish) analysts are wrong...

Let me rephrase, I think most longs expects a little erosion in Dell's advantage overtime...with the large portion being maintained...the surprise "38%" revs. was taken as a proxy by some analysts (and a few bulls, and DEFINENTLY bears) that other competitors direct models were catching on, and they were closing the gap...this, if true, could have serious long-term consequences..which already may have started kicking in.....

Now, it appears that Dell missed expectations due to a weak January (for the entire industry)...and that 4Q numbers from Dataquest/IDC were skewed not only due to seasonality, but also due to some stuffing...For a true (Dell) long, this appears to be really good news...Others are trying to implement direct, and it is making hardly a dent in the basic industry growth relationship: Industry=x, Compaq=1.5x, Dell=3/4x, etc..

You should read some of Compaq's thread today (Bretsky's posts)...very enlightening concerning Compaq's problems (from a VAR perspective) in implementing the direct model.....Summation: HP is going to put severe pressure on CPQ for indirect (VAR), and, in Bretsky's view, CPQ will not be able to compete with Dell in direct...



To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (105364)2/26/1999 1:44:00 PM
From: SirVinny  Respond to of 176387
 
CTC, your intuition may eventually be proven to be correct afterall. From reading your posts over the last few weeks I noticed that you seem to be inquisitive and have done considerable homework in collecting data from various sources and analyzing all this informatiom which led you to form a well thought out opinion.

My question, which pees me off at this point, is why do these fat-cat analysts NOT do their homework?? Channel stuffing - if you saw it, why didn't they??

SirVinny



To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (105364)2/26/1999 3:05:00 PM
From: HDC  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
CTC: Excellent point Re: Channel Stuffing! This is the reason I left Compaq for Dell early last year. Back then, CPQ management said that sales were fine with only to find out later what we all know was the BIG INVENTORY GLUT OF 1998. You have to watch CPQ carefully!

Best,

Duncan



To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (105364)2/26/1999 5:39:00 PM
From: jim kelley  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 176387
 
CTC,

My guess is 22 days of stuff over the two week inventory target from looking at the receivables on the financial statement.

JK