Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Handshake™ who wrote (9503)	2/27/1999 12:17:00 PM
From: on parole	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 25548

You're right Vince no one can prove it but just by logic wouldn't you come to the conclusion when we hit the .30s you would have heavy selling by insiders if there was some scam going on, and the price would be tanking? Sure the volume has been heavy the past few weeks, shouldn't it be? We've gone from .075 to the .30s in a few weeks. Penny traders work off percentages not price. Even crooks like to maximize their gains but the volume has been low once we hit the .30s. Yesterday was a high volume day with buying. I find this encouraging. Also consider all the big blocks of shares. These big players if part of some deception would be trying to beat each other to the exits because as they say there is no honor among crooks. The only rational conclusion I can come to is these insiders believe there is much more value still to come, than this .30 share price.I value your thoughts and the interaction but I also want to present another side of the coin for everyone to consider. We have many new investors looking at us as evidenced by Ken Sammut's update, the article in the NY Times, and Charles Payne's newsletter. I feel it is important that these new potential investors be able to consider all possibilities and form their own conclusion. Thoughts everyone?