SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (36177)2/28/1999 12:54:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Translation: "It was great as long as we used it to go after Republicans, but then blimey, they went and got themselves elected the majority, blowing our sorry asses out of the Congress, and now we're on the ropes, and the law is exposing our every outrageous obstructionist/perjurious powerbroker. Next they'll probably go after the President's crooked friends, like that Webster Hubbel fella..oh yeah I forgot the IC already put his ass in the slammer.."

Ken Starr has demonstrated the danger of an unlimited prosecutor out of control. The independent council law is dead because of Ken Starr. I guess that was his best achievement; be so outrageous that the law is killed. It is a bad law and I'm glad to see it go. It is an unconstitutional setup IMO. We are left though with some uncertainty as to how really bizarre things like Iran Contra can be exposed and dealt with.



To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (36177)2/28/1999 12:58:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen  Respond to of 67261
 
btw, my posts are submitting fine. it's probably a plot by right-wing wackos to destroy your posts.

Actually yesterday I was having a difficult time with the zero-sum error. Probably another bug in the SI code. You might send a message to the webmaster, but they probably already have been notified.



To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (36177)2/28/1999 10:27:00 AM
From: Bob Lao-Tse  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
>>...HIGHER principles such as civil rights...

Which rights? The right to perjury? The right to obstruction? The right to cling tenaciously to the Presidency after demonstrating your utter contempt for the American legal system?

I've often wondered if the Clinton partisans continue to support him because they're as amoral and vile as he is. Or are they just that willfully ignorant and self-involved? Or are they just stupid? Hmmm?

-BLT