Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Graham and Doddsville -- Value Investing In The New Era -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Freedom Fighter who wrote (1396)	3/1/1999 8:13:00 PM
From: porcupine --''''>	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1722

"I want to." If you really wanted to, you would. But, you insist on having the last word, in a way that is so disrespectful that no one could fail to respond. "But if you use part of a prior post of mine to make a point, and I feel that it does not express my thoughts or views completely, I feel compelled to respond to it and clarify." This is a perfect example. Imnsho, no one in the history of the Internet has been more fair in quoting prior posts, line by line, than I have in your case. You're not being mischaracterized. You're being exposed. The two are different. If you don't want to discuss Laszlo Birinyi, don't attack the posting in the first place. If you don't want to discuss the AS, don't post it. If you can't bear to see Hussman attacked (still to come), but can't afford to "waste 5 minutes" defending him, don't bring him up. This has been a recurring theme for some two years. You want to score unanswered points, expressed either in your own words, or those of others. That's an unrealistic expectation, especially in an Internet bulletin-board type forum. It's amazing, and telling, that you still don't see this. porc --''''>