SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (36319)3/1/1999 6:45:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
Well, the obvious point here is that it is quite a stretch to go from the equivalent of NOWs (or anybody's) judgement on how to deal with some alleged crimes (or misconduct) by an individual whether it is Clinton, Starr or Thomas, vs. a sweeping statement that loosely associates rapists and pro-life people. The majority of people are pro-life in this country and statements like that are personally offensive. Its the difference between the right saying 'Clinton is amoral', and my defense of Clinton in the third person because I don't believe in the methods, vs. the right calling me immoral.

Having said that, I didn't see the entire show. I was in the kitchen at the time and missed Patricia Ireland's comments apparently.



To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (36319)3/1/1999 8:16:00 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 67261
 
There you go again. Logical arguments just don't register with the likes of Harris, Looney Cooney, etc. JLA