SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Katherine Derbyshire who wrote (28773)3/3/1999 10:57:00 AM
From: John L.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
I don't have numbers in front of me but would guess AMAT has a higher % of equipment vs. Intel % of all chips produced. AMAT is the leader in many products while Intel doesn't participate in memory, analog, logic chips so the comparison seems to me like apples and oranges. AMAT and Intel are #1 in chip equipment and chip revenue and I believe Intel has more competitors going after there market. AMAT is taking competitors market share in CMP, ETCH and probably other areas. I think Intel might be loseing market share, at 90% they have more to lose and little to gain.



To: Katherine Derbyshire who wrote (28773)3/3/1999 11:19:00 AM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 70976
 
Katherine,

Did you listen to the last CC? J Morgan said they could provide a total 300mm solution for any chipmanker wanting to go forward.

BTW, AMD recently overtook INTC in terms of market share in the fastest growing segment of the MPU sector. I doubt that INTC can lay claim to 90%; that is a number from years ago.

BK



To: Katherine Derbyshire who wrote (28773)3/3/1999 11:37:00 AM
From: Duker  Respond to of 70976
 
<<Last I checked, AMAT could not claim 90% market share in any process equipment segment, much less in the overall equipment business. INTC can.>>

INTC has a 90% share of the process equipment segment?

--Duker

<g>