Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (36649)	3/3/1999 2:09:00 PM
From: JBL	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Boston Globe Mar 3 1999 editorial A BOSTON GLOBE EDITORIAL Clinton must come clean Only two people know if Juanita Broaddrick is telling the truth about what happened in a Little Rock hotel room 21 years ago. The country heard from one of them in Broaddrick's seemingly credible interview on ''Dateline NBC'' last week. She said Bill Clinton, then attorney general of Arkansas and a candidate for governor, raped her. The country must hear from the president: not through his lawyer but directly, in a national address. The seriousness of this charge demands a response in kind. An accusation of rape cannot be dismissed as just another ''bimbo eruption'' or one more randy rumor about a man's sexual escapades. Broaddrick's allegation of sexual assault is something quite different, for it accuses the man who is now president of committing a violent crime. Juanita Broaddrick's accusation, if true, cannot be judged in the light of politics. It is about callous brutality. She may be lying, and her story could indeed have politics at its core. If so, the president should loudly deny it, even at the risk of being ridiculed for another impassioned assertion of his nonrelationship with a woman. The truth is more important than the ridicule. If the truth is in between - that there was sex but it was consensual - Clinton should say that. Juanita Broaddrick has not flinched at the skeptics critical of her for first filing an affidavit denying the assault and later recanting to the FBI. She told NBC's Lisa Myers that she had to tell the truth publicly now because she ''couldn't hold it in any longer.'' She said she did not go to police in 1978 because she thought no one would believe her. She said she blamed herself - a sadly common reaction of rape victims, even in the more enlightened 1990s. While her story is no longer legally relevant after 21 years, it is still morally relevant, for it concerns the man elected to lead a nation. It's time for Bill Clinton to tell us who that man is.

To: TigerPaw who wrote (36649)	3/3/1999 2:12:00 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

...One Nation Under God Government presumes its people find value in religion, and therefore has deemed houses of worship tax free. These temples range from ornate Catholic and High Episcopalean Churches to Jesse Jackson's dining hall.

To: TigerPaw who wrote (36649)	3/3/1999 5:27:00 PM
From: Gary E. Johnson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

The church is a group of people of like beliefs. They pool their money to construct a building in which to meet. They find one person among themsleves or a like minded outsider. They pay him to teach them so he has the time to do it. If he had to provide for his family via another job, he would not be able to help the people of the church. This is a group of people that should also reach out and help those within the group and outsiders. Year end no $ profit. I fail to see the comparison. In your example, everyone wants to drink together or at least have somewhere to go to enjoy each others company. So, they pool their money, buy a building, hire someone to pour and listen to their conversations. He takes their money, buys more drink, and goes out to the community and dispenses some of the leftover drink and listens to their troubles. Then he gets some of the people from their meeting place to help him fix up the communities homes, or visit them in the hospital. Year end, no $ profit. I think not! You know as well as I do that churches must be tax free. Our morality in this country has declined as it is. Can you imagine what it would be without the influence of churches?