Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (36704)	3/3/1999 3:32:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

"Violent substance"? Hahahahahahahha, please tell me you are joking. The only violent substances I'm aware of are human beings. I wonder how many of those children you cite might have been saved if one responsible adult had immediate access to a handgun with which to shoot the perp? Get a clue, violent criminals don't obey "the Brady Bill". Most don't like to have their weapons registered. Law abiding citizens do. I have no problem with registering my weapon or even meeting a usage education requirement. bp

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (36704)	3/3/1999 3:32:00 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

The NRA DEMANDS that guns be kept out of the hand of criminals. They DEMAND that crimes committed with guns be EXTREAMELY HARSHLY punished. It is laws that prevent law abiding citizens from protecting themselves with guns that they fight.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (36704)	3/3/1999 4:52:00 PM
From: Ish	Respond to of 67261

<<I am in favor of outlawing any "violent substance" >> You have any bleach on hand? Brake fluid in your car. You have bomb making substances. Gasoline, cloth and a bottle? A man was shot in the head by the IBI and they justified it because he had bomb making substances. They had the wrong house but used that to justify their actions.