Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (1172)	3/4/1999 11:43:00 AM
From: 1king	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 5821

Ahhhh Todays bizarre geology lesson! You are like a mobile Joke Thread, remember it is better to be thought a fool than post this crap and prove it;-) The key is the heat sources. In this they should be looking for alteration and felsic markers and volcanic seabed vent activities. Within a few 1000 feet of every nickel deposit around the edge of the anticline there should be rhyolitic pyroclastic or quartz porphry bodies. Absolute bullshit. You are reading the VMS chapter LOL!!! Your are becoming more embarrassing with each post so I won't chide you anymore on you staggering ignorance. Of more pertinence to NWI Borehole TEM DOES give an estimate of the size and geometry, while IP is fairly qualitative. Further to the discussion of the apparent offset of the mineralization from the IP and magnetic anomalies, one must wonder what "their definition" of an anomaly is. The whole data set may actually indicate the presence of the intersected mineralization. Note the drilling was targeted on a TEM anomaly and I am not sure if they gave the style (e.g. dipole spacing) of the IP survey. Closely spaced dipoles may have only penetrated 100m or so, explaining why the IP anomaly was located up-dip on section. It is odd that they plan 50 step-outs when the section indicates that the mineralization was intersected ~100m along line (plan). In this case it will take 2-3 holes to get back into that high grade zone. I would expect a much more narrow intersection from a vertical hole. Regardless the market loves it so we can all make some money in the mean time. In for the ride and good luck to all, 1King BTW Erroneous Charters, if you only talk to PhD's why dump your dribble on SI?