Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Martin E. Frankel who wrote (19062)	3/5/1999 10:46:00 AM
From: FREAKAZOID	Respond to of 44908

<<To Freak: As late as last night you were defending "Sword"... saying you were PMing back and forth and "Sword" was really a "good guy". Do you still feel the same way now after his/her "revelation" (i.e.: an admitted liar)? >> Nope!! as I said on RB "off with his head". I have no tolerance for liars and the like. freak!!

To: Martin E. Frankel who wrote (19062)	3/5/1999 10:52:00 AM
From: Suzanne Newsome	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

This orgy of righteousness is a sight to behold! But, a reality check: if the terms of the private placement had been made public in a timely, straightforward manner as Swordsman demanded on many occasions, the 90 million shares and the related facts would have been made public at the same time. No one would have been caught in the situation of knowing about the 90 million shares, but not knowing about the shares in escrow. TSIG is a filing company and hangs its dirty laundry out to dry 4 times a year. Used to be, the stock tanked every time a quarterly report came out. With so much stuff published that we would all rather not read, the company's failure to make the terms of the PP public only served to create suspicion and distrust. I admit that in the past Robert Gordon has had his reasons for playing his cards close to his chest (i.e. purchase of CCI, Darrell Piercy); perhaps it will become apparent one day why he was less than forthcoming about the PP. I am in no way defending Swordsman's actions—saying he sold, then saying he never sold while posting on another public board that he sold and bought back in lower. This is indefensible! However, if anyone sold because Swordsman sold, please recall some of his earlier posts. During a discussion of spelling and grammar mistakes on the web site, Swordsman DEMANDED that the person responsible for a mistake be fired immediately! This is catastrophic, all-or-none thinking and, in my opinion, does not represent the best thinking we have available on the subject. The BB is a minefield; choose the person you walk behind very carefully. Regards, Suzanne