Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenny Low who wrote (53767)	3/5/1999 7:06:00 PM
From: s martin	Respond to of 55532

>> the point that I believe that is trying to be made is that the information was there, the nays presented it publicly here repeatedly, yet you (and others like myself) chose to ignore it, claiming that it was all part of a plot by the evil short-sellers. << THUD!!! Fortunately not all shareholders chose to ignore it. There are many who did take advantage of what was presented and extricated themselves before the halt. Hopefully, the lesson has been learned by those who did not. The lesson is that not everyone who "bashes" a stock, has a monetary motive for doing so. I don't know of a "basher" who didn't learn this lesson the hard way. Knowledge is power.

To: Kenny Low who wrote (53767)	3/5/1999 7:48:00 PM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 55532

The evidence MAY have been there, but it was not of the PUBLIC nature, and there is NO WAY anyone could have legally received the information that they were claiming (TA sheets, shareholder lists from the TA, and copies of private faxes and letters between RMIL and promoters.) to have had, and no amount of telephone calls would have revealed this information. Others and myself have always claimed that the old TA was in bed with the suspected shorts, and the fact that 2 weeks ago I was sent the April 1997 TA transfer sheets shows me that someone was in fact getting information in a non-public manner from the TA. Granted, It would have been nice for all shareholders to have seen these sheets back in Aug-Dec 1997, the facts remain that we did not. The facts are this. All shareholders were doing the DD based upon the legal methods, and the nays had insider information and or confidential information that was not public, and no amount of legal activities on our part would have ever uncovered what they were in position. RG 718-331-1960