Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Riley G who wrote (53769)	3/5/1999 8:37:00 PM
From: s martin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Why don't you take a stab at these questions you ignored the last time I posted them ? We verified all these lies, why didn't you ? This was all public easily verifiable information. The information that was publically available but which you chose to ignore was in ample supply. The Hialeah plant was closed. There were no contracts with suppliers, the Nicagraguan plant was repossessed. The Ten Sleep facility was idle, not active. RMCW was not a distributor of water. RMCW in fact was not being distributed at all. There was no contract with Taiwan for water. The Pilar de Caribe was underwater not sailing the ocean delivering goods. There were numbers for you to contact, there was a newspaper article about the Ten Sleep facility, the mayor of Ten Sleep, the owner of the Hialeah plant, the harbormaster in Jamaica were all available for verification. In addition the lies about the TA's could have been verified. You had to know that promoters were paid, because you knew Zapara was a promoter. Hazlet Newsletter, Stocks for Tomorrow and SGA Goldstar were all newsletters who accepted payment for their recomendations as was Equities the magazine you claim to have read and believed. Who do you think believes that you didn't know this was a scam ?

To: Riley G who wrote (53769)	3/5/1999 9:17:00 PM
From: TopCat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

>>>(TA sheets, shareholder lists from the TA, and copies of private faxes and letters between RMIL and promoters.) <<< There you go again, Riley. Trying to divert attention away from the real issue....(like using Mork to divert attention away from the "fundamentals" of OVIS/RMIL).....that you continued to refute information that was public. Don't try to get out of this by saying you didn't have all the information because it wasn't public...Enough was! And, BTW, why do you keep mentioning tonto when you talk about your sources of the "other" information? Are you trying to be nice in giving credit, or....... Again, a summary of the information provided over and over which you denied to be true.....which is simply the inverse of lying. >>>The Hialeah plant was closed. There were no contracts with suppliers, the Nicagraguan plant was repossessed. The Ten Sleep facility was idle, not active. RMCW was not a distributor of water. RMCW in fact was not being distributed at all. There was no contract with Taiwan for water. The Pilar de Caribe was underwater not sailing the ocean delivering goods. There were numbers for you to contact, there was a newspaper article about the Ten Sleep facility, the mayor of Ten Sleep, the owner of the Hialeah plant, the harbormaster in Jamaica were all available for verification. In addition the lies about the TA's could have been verified. You had to know that promoters were paid, because you knew Zapara was a promoter. Hazlet Newsletter, Stocks for Tomorrow and SGA Goldstar were all newsletters who accepted payment for their recomendations as was Equities the magazine you claim to have read and believed. Who do you think believes that you didn't know this was a scam ? <<<

To: Riley G who wrote (53769)	3/5/1999 11:43:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

The evidence MAY have been there, but it was not of the PUBLIC nature, and there is NO WAY anyone could have legally received the information that they were claiming (TA sheets, shareholder lists from the TA, and copies of private faxes and letters between RMIL and promoters.) to have had, and no amount of telephone calls would have revealed this information. I thought you were supposed to be the detective type. Someone who knew how to "investigate". Instead, what you did was accept the company line. Push the company line, in fact. Seeking information from non-company sources is not "illegal". It is "sensible". What you say reminds me of those on the AZNT thread who castigate us for talking to the attorneys for the persons and entities the company is foolishly suing: Pugs's (and others) posts to us suggest that to do so is tantamount to a criminal act. Ridiculous. If you begin to ask the right questions, people will come to you with information. To say that these kinds of investigations can't be conducted by ordinary people online is simply not true. It's been done, is being done, and will continue to be done. Often quite effectively.