Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (32183)	3/7/1999 8:32:00 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

No, of course not. I don't mean to say that anyone strays "because she let herself go." I'm saying a simple, common-sensical thing: sexier, more attractive women tend to have an advantage over their sexually boring sisters both in and out of marriage. Men, not being idiots and being genetically programmed in this direction, prefer hot sex from their partners, and many things go into making it hot for a man, and that includes, among the many, the apppearance of the partner. (I'm saying men; we know it works both ways.) Please don't make an anecdotal list of attractive women whose extremely powerful husbands, (who happened to have had a world of sexual choices,) were, in spite of their attractiveness, also attracted to other women! Hey, if men had it their way and it didn't cost them nothin', they'd all spread their seed far and wide. The ones who didn't do that in our ancestral environment tended to have fewer descendants. The dominant males who could and did, had scads. Our dear hubbies are their spawn!