Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : WCTI (Wordcruncher Internet) Search Engine of the future. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Smilodon who wrote (4710)	3/10/1999 11:25:00 AM
From: Guy.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5300

Archer, if i am not mistaken you posted here couple of days ago when i asked if someone can short EBAY for me. I am not saying that WCTI will be a success, but you are saying there are other small caps. Well, the same EBAY, which is the biggest joke in market history was also a little unknown company. Nobody thought then that it will reach 20 billion market cap. Its ridiculous market cap doesn't seem to bother the idiots from WOLPE-BROWN(SP?) to give EBAY a BUY recommendation. They should stick their license in their asses. Merill Linch can do that as well with their recommendations about YHOO and AMZN. In year 2050 maybe they'll justify the recent price. So, who knows, maybe one day a bunch of Brokers morons will recommend WCTI in 200$ a share. Guy

To: Smilodon who wrote (4710)	3/10/1999 3:33:00 PM
From: Mark S.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5300

Managing a hedge fund makes you no expert in internet search engines. I like you like to read the post and have been quite disturbed with the hype and the shorts. However some of your comments are from a gut feeling based on your econ background not fundamental research. I am having trouble justifying either position in my mind. IN my opinion, both sides make sense. Who are you to know what WCTI's cash position is or isn't. I haven't seen any financials, have you?