SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mohan Marette who wrote (108923)3/10/1999 7:16:00 PM
From: Chuzzlewit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
Aha, Mohan, here it is:

(Today's deal) will enhance [Dell's] ability…to open up or tap new portions of the market that we may not reach today," said Paul Bell, senior vice president of the home and small business group at Dell.

This presages a push into the home computer market. It is essentially a retail business. But I still don't see a cause for excitement.

TTFN,
CTC



To: Mohan Marette who wrote (108923)3/10/1999 8:02:00 PM
From: Lockeon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
Hi Mohan - NEVER BET AGAINST MICHAEL DELL - It is now official - <G>. At least one publication gets it...Fortune Investor.

Check this article out - what really struck me was the reason behind that Kumar fellows upgrade and raise of estimates for Gateway from 0.6 to 0.9 - he was piqued at being upstaged by Niles - I mean heavens, if this is why these idiots do upgrades and downgrades...... and people think they may actually KNOW something - <LOL>.... (I know how much you admire analysts ... <VBG>).

pathfinder.com

________________________________________________________

Never Bet Against
Michael Dell


When Dell's stock slipped for two
weeks in February, some
analysts talked up Gateway.
Then Dell announced his next
moves.

Amy Kover

When Michael Dell stopped by FORTUNE
in late February, it seemed as if his
company's days as the darling of the PC
world were ending. For the past two years
investors had gotten used to around 50%
annual revenue growth from Dell Computer,
and its stock price had boomed 1,214%, to
a high of $108.63. But on Feb. 12,
BancBoston Robertson Stephens analyst
Daniel Niles slashed his fourth-quarter
revenue estimates from the consensus $5.5
billion to $5.2 billion--a mere 38% or so
jump from fourth-quarter 1997--citing
"flattening component costs and increased
direct competition." Richard Gardner of
Salomon Smith Barney chimed in with similar
concerns.

Niles turned out to be eerily correct: Four
days later Dell reported fourth-quarter
revenues of $5.173 billion. By Feb. 19 the
stock price had been battered down 26%,
to $80. So some analysts began looking
past Dell and casting eyes at former
consumer-PC outcast Gateway 2000.
Despite a spotty earnings record and a
reputation for poor service, the company
had developed a three-pronged marketing
strategy that some experts believed would
characterize the future of the PC
industry--and maybe even propel Gateway
past Dell.

Dream on. By early March, Dell had
confounded its doubters by announcing two
major developments in rapid-fire
succession, and its stock recouped some of
the losses. (For that matter, even its
"disappointing" 38% increase in revenue
would be a fantasy come true for most
companies.)

First, Dell launched an e-commerce
Website, Gigabuys.com, through which it
will sell more than 30,000 outside products
such as software, printers, and even games
(adding to its $14 million in daily sales
involving the Web). It's a great way for the
company to squeeze more revenue from its
consumer base. And as Michael Kwatinetz
of Credit Suisse First Boston puts it,
"Through Gigabuys, Dell can build a
stronger, longer-lasting relationship with
customers than by simply selling them a
box."

Also exciting, Dell cut a seven-year, $16
billion pact with IBM for components used
mostly in the very large computers that it
sells to major companies. Because IBM's
technology is considered top quality, the
deal could strengthen Dell's position in that
business. To produce components itself,
Dell would have to get into a whole new line
of business. "Essentially it's a marriage of
one company that has terrific technology to
one with great marketing," says Walter
Winnitzki of Hambrecht & Quist. And analyst
Phil Rueppel of BT Alex. Brown predicts that
there could be more Dell-IBM deals to
come. For instance: "It would make sense
for Dell to produce PCs for IBM." Sums up
Mark Specker of the research firm
SoundView: "Once again Dell continues to
prove how fiercely competitive it is, and it
won't be left behind when it comes to
execution."

Dell's snappy comeback emphasizes that it
and Gateway are playing in very different
leagues. Gateway focuses mainly on
consumers and small companies, whereas
Dell deals with bigger businesses and on a
much larger scale.


So why did analysts get so excited about
Gateway in the first place? The buzz
started with Ashok Kumar, tech analyst for
U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray. Kumar had
actually downgraded Dell back in November
and was peeved that Niles' Feb. 12
downgrade had overshadowed his. Taking
another bold leap, on Feb. 22 he upgraded
Gateway from a "buy" to "strong buy." He
also announced a ridiculously inflated
estimate for fourth-quarter earnings--90
cents per share, vs. the consensus 60
cents.

Annoyed Gateway officials told analysts at
a recent conference to stick with the
consensus.
But Kumar's call caught on.
Within two days, Gateway's stock had
soared by over $10, to a 52-week high of
$83. (It has dropped back since then.) And
NB Montgomery upgraded its rating to "buy"
from "hold."

The Gateway boomlet was based on more
than just one analyst's estimate. At its root
is the general assumption that the entire PC
industry will be facing slower revenue
growth and increased price competition as
consumer demand for high-priced
computers eases: With PC ownership
expanding to lower-income groups, fewer
new buyers can afford expensive models. In
that sort of world, the only way to make
money is to persuade people to buy
components and, someday, another
computer. And Gateway has a plan to
capture such a recurring revenue stream by
making itself accessible.

For instance, it is populating America's strip
malls with what it calls Country
Stores--storefronts designed to lure
Sunday drivers and small-business owners
as well as provide a service center for
veteran users. It's also learning to use the
Internet, booking $10 million per day in
Web-related sales. In addition, Gateway
actually beat Dell to the punch in
e-commerce by buying a portion of online
retailer NECX a week before Dell launched
Gigabuys.

A brilliant strategy isn't enough, however.
Gateway also has to execute it. So CEO
Ted Waitt has brought in a new
management team, which he hopes will
solve the company's periodic problems of
poor service and delivery. But there are
anecdotal signs, at least, that things have
yet to improve. Money.com, for example,
recently received a note complaining,
"Since Jan. 18 (Gateway's internet) service
has been extremely poor to nonexistent."

Nevertheless, something clearly has
changed: Dell's late-February slide gave
Gateway an opportunity to make new
friends, even if they're back in love with
Dell now. "Gateway showed that it's a
trendsetter," H&Q's Winnitzki says. So there
still might be room for Gateway to
flourish--albeit in Dell's shadow.

Buzzwords

Bathtub curve:
How volume typically flows over the
course of a day--heavy in the
morning (everyone gets in); flat
during the day (lunch); heavy at the
close.

Shadow trading:
Moving in and out of the market
without anyone's noticing.

Issue date: March 29, 1999
Vol. 139, No. 6
__________________________________________________

Regards......

Have a GREAT day...



To: Mohan Marette who wrote (108923)3/11/1999 8:39:00 AM
From: JRI  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
Apparently Ralph is now calling for 11,500/12,000 by July/August (so says CNBC)...guess I was right, but off by a day or two <g>



To: Mohan Marette who wrote (108923)3/11/1999 9:30:00 AM
From: Zeeko  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
Mohan / Tread .....I'm back. Wife forced me from the basement when it was clear the sky was not falling. She made me go out and make some earned income. What the hell is going on with Dell ;o). I left last week for a court case and come back and it's tanked 50%. Well it will come back I just know it will.

The sky may be falling again though. I just got this off the wire. I hope its not true. If it is my 401K/IRA/Roth will be affected <g>

drudgereport.com

Go Dell!!!!!!!

Zeeko (big tongue in cheek)



To: Mohan Marette who wrote (108923)3/11/1999 2:21:00 PM
From: Mehitabel  Respond to of 176387
 
Mohan,some thoughts on how dell can gain market share and grow revenues in an industry where unit shipments are showing good growth, but revenues are not.

Dell's "playing judo" in servers provides an example of how this comes about.

in MD's book, pp 201-203, MD describes "playing judo with the competition" --a strategy of choosing your competition so that you move aggressively in on an industry segment where the market share leader enjoys very high margins.

Althouth the leader has been enjoying a plummy situation, it is in fact extremely vulnerable to a competitor like Dell. Dell can create a catch-22 for this competitor where it has to choose between high market share and hi margins, but can not have both.

Servers have been a clear example of the dell's impeccable execution of this strategy. Dell realized that competitors were earning more than half their profits in servers, which were "onerously and unjustifiably priced."

Furthermore, excess profits from servers was being used to subsidize lower profits or losses in their PC business.

By entering the server market, dell was able to kill two birds with one stone:

1. enter a new high growth high margin market itself

2. crunch competitors margins and put a stop to their use of these margins to make
up for losses they were taking in PCs.

In September 1996, dell introduced a new line of servers at very competitive prices.
By Q4 1998, dell was #2 in the US with a 20% market share.

Dell's growth in servers was 95%,and dell attained the
position of #2 in the US with a 20% market share

What was the effect on competitors? Title of IDC summary press release for 3/3/99 was "Entry server market growth held back in 1998". IDC reports that revenue *declined* 2%, the first time in many years without a double digit growth in revenues.

Why the decline? a number of reasons, but including these:

decline in average selling price
shift from proprietary to low end Intel servers

Ouch, Mikey. That hurts. Cut it out!

IDC conclusion: dell (and SUNW) escaped the negative impact with effective pricing and targeted ISP campaigns that capitalized on the internet

idc.com

IMO, results in the 1998 server market as reported by IDC show clearly that dell *can* achieve high growth and gain market share even while revenue growth in an industry is declining. Dell can do this *because* it is dell's own aggressive pricing that caused the decrease in competitors prices as they struggle to meet competition from Dell, and which shows up in aggregate numbers as a decline in revenue growth

when unit shipments are high but revenues are down, this state of affairs does not necessarily mean *dell* is suffering. It may mean that dell is giving certain chosen competitors some high kicks.




To: Mohan Marette who wrote (108923)3/11/1999 2:39:00 PM
From: Mehitabel  Respond to of 176387
 
Mohan,this continues the discussion of how dell can prosper by creating a market in which unit shipments are robust but revenues grow less strongly.

Dataquest server numbers show similar results to those reported by IDC and lead to the same conclusions.

For the US entry level server market, Dataquest reports "US server revenues decrease 4.3% in Q4, while shipments grew 15.9%

gartner5.gartnerweb.com

Dataquest: "Entry level server growth was greater than 19%, but revenues were flat as *technological differentiation disappeared in this segment and logistics execution has become more important*"

What happened to individual competitors in this market?

IBM #1 and CPQ #2 had flat and low growth.
Dell #5 had 95% growth and gained market share

HP and SUNW #3 and #4 had growth of 18-20%

OTHERS had negative 40% growth, revenues dropped from $1.4B to 0.83B, and market share dropped from 30% to 18.8%

clearly dell did fine in this industry segment while competitors suffered because dell *produced* this very state of affairs for its own advantage by playing judo with them and crunching their margins.

------------------------------
Where will dell play judo next?

we know storage will be one industry segment, because MD has said this is a high-margin industry where dell has targeted explansion.

another likely candidate is mid-level servers, which, according to IDC "continues to be a segment where vendors are in control of their own destinies in price/performance" (read: dell has not yet moved in on them and removed their control of price/performance)

idc.com

---------------------------------
IDC and Dataquest summaries of future market for servers, entry and midlevel?

"long term remains favorable as Xeon chip will give boost to overall market. Expects Japan, consolidation, etc to create an 'aggressive rebound' to double digit growth in worldwide revenues"

"key trends (in midlevel servers) will be consolidation and clustering of servers, Y2K and demand from e-commerce"

IMO, the market analysis of mid-level servers casts light on the IBM-dell deal.

IBM motive for deal--IBM server growth has slowed, HP gaining on them. To do nothing is death by a thousand cuts.

Dell motive for deal--technology to move up into mid-level server range and continue playing judo in still another high margin market segment where the markets are still plummy and "unjustifiable", and the vendors hence vulnerable to aggressive moves by dell.

1999 is going to be fascinating as all this unfolds