Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg McDaniel who wrote (9077)	3/10/1999 8:04:00 PM
From: Alastair McIntosh	Respond to of 27311

Greg and thread, I thought that this article on lithium-polymer batteries was interesting: darnell.com My apologies if this was previously referenced. Al

To: Greg McDaniel who wrote (9077)	3/10/1999 8:29:00 PM
From: Pallisard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Greg, I thought there was a consensus that early to mid April was the time frame we conjectured for PO's. I'm referring to posts of a few weeks ago. Do you remember if this is correct? Thanks.

To: Greg McDaniel who wrote (9077)	3/10/1999 11:15:00 PM
From: P. Ramamoorthy	Respond to of 27311

Greg - Re.:"...volume is speaking louder than we want to admit..." Agree. About a week ago, I got a similar "signal" and posted so. At the time I had to rationalize the Conf. Call (?) and other statements like "they were running out of cash by the end of March", "want to bring the stock price up in the teens before doing a secondary" etc. and explain the stock price behavior. But couldn't. So, I prepared myself for a possible disappointment - no P. O.'s in March. I may be wrong, in crying wolf. Ram

To: Greg McDaniel who wrote (9077)	3/11/1999 9:58:00 AM
From: John Curtis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Greg: I don't expect any announcements in March(but remember, this merely be me opinion). Recall(and I'm in no way patting meself on the back, heh) that back in December I stated end of 1st quarter AT THE EARLIEST as my guess as to the possible announcements of contracts. So far time has proven the accuracy of this guess. Conservatively, and referencing the most recent 10K where it was stated that the line(s) are projected to be fully functional by the end of VLNC's 1st quarter fiscal year 2000(this means end of March), I feel we may not hear anything for another couple of months(end of May to end of June). This ain't a bad thing(despite my admittedly growing impatience, heh), just different from all the hyperbole being expressed. I would expect, however, IF VLNC is on track with their 10K statement, that in early April there'll be an announcement of line/plant efficacy(if'n they've got ANY P.R. sense at all). This I would consider a minor material event. What would be a major material event? Public OEM agreement of product efficacy and/or P.O.'s!!!! Period. Of course, assuming OEM's are gonna want to run tests of product coming off that publicly announced functional line(s) before making a final commitment is what makes me project the above mentioned May/June time-frame. I'll admit I'm talking out of me a...(heh) with regard's to this guess. But it's based on the only corporately sanctioned information available to all at this time. I'd love to be proven wrong by VLNC corporate. Meanwhile, the current stock malaise allows me to continue me stockpiling since B.R. joining the board(and buying), along with insiders buying LARGE indicates things should be a'bubblin' in the latter half of this year........ ;-) To also it allows me to focus on other, more immediate return possibilites as well. Regards! John~