Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Glenn J. Mullan who wrote (1387)	3/11/1999 11:02:00 AM
From: Brumell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5821

A very interesting post, Glenn. Makes a lot of sense. Just one question. When you say: << there were another 15 similar magnetic targets within 20-km or so of the Nuinsco discovery? >> Are you referring to bulls-eye type Airborne EM-Magnetic Targets? Bob

To: Glenn J. Mullan who wrote (1387)	3/11/1999 11:19:00 AM
From: Tom Cat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5821

Glenn, Thank you for your comments, in general, how does this geology differs from Vosey Bay's?. It seems to me that DFR's was a single deposit (+ eastern deeps)so far, however, in Sudbury and the Raglan, there are several disseminted deposits, would Lac Rocher be more close to the Raglan's model?. Also, can you expand yuor comment on Flaconbridge's approach for staking?, are you saying that they staked in the same geological make up of the properties you listed in your noter (DNI, QMI, et al)?. TC