Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Microphonics Inc. (mrps) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gutterball who wrote (3428)	3/11/1999 1:03:00 PM
From: arno	Respond to of 8189

Hey Dan, Thanks!!!! for the post. Lots to read. I was wondering where you were. arno

To: Gutterball who wrote (3428)	3/11/1999 1:11:00 PM
From: Jon Scott	Respond to of 8189

Correct Hysteria is not needed. MRPS will rise on its own. But I guess it's always nice to revel knowing that the odds may have been beaten.

To: Gutterball who wrote (3428)	3/11/1999 1:14:00 PM
From: Joe-MA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8189

I am no yahoo, sir. It was I who wrote the report in post #2976-(you refer to it as reply-8224058) and what do you mean"you expected more from me" I don't know you. I will write this only once and I refuse to talk with anyone who so jugmentally and crudely slams others(and now me)

To: Gutterball who wrote (3428)	3/11/1999 2:32:00 PM
From: learnstocks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8189

Dan, first of all, thank you for providing the hyperlink to the administrative law judge's decision on 3/2/99 as outlined in your 3248. I know that I will be "slammed" for being sympathetic to this post, but I have read carefully the whole account and am quite surprised. Everyone who is interested in full disclosure of the activities of investment bankers should read this for themselves, it is chilling. In a nutshell, Russo Securities, Inc. (RSI), a Staten Island broker-dealer which was supposed to be an investment banker for MRPS was sanctioned by the decision. Also, MR. Patrick Russo and Ms. Kimberly Kent were sanctioned. The activities in question, as I read it, took place between 121/95 and 3/96. Three entities were fined and the two people involved were both fined and trading sanctions were placed on them as individuals. But, read it for yourselves, if you are interested in full disclosure. Does this have direct effect on MRPS and the movement of its stock? I don't know. I am just commenting on this for those who don't want to read it for themselves. Vic

To: Gutterball who wrote (3428)	3/11/1999 8:29:00 PM
From: Cytotekk	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 8189

So Ricky, splain this to me. If Russo is dirty, (sec infractions), as you say, are you saying that the management of MRPS is guilty by association? They, the trusting MRPS management, should have known what was going on with the rogue Russos using:...mind reading, fortune telling, tarot cards, horoscopes, bones, tea leaves, psychics, clairvoyance, a medium, a sleepy vision, private detectives, surveillance, the FBI, the SEC...any and all of the above? If I hire someone who ultimately commits a crime, you are saying that I am automatically guilty, i.e., dirty? So, we are all to be judged by the company we keep? Guilty by association? Birds of a feather that flock together? The apple that does not fall far from the tree? Like father like son? I am curious why you damn MRPS for any Russo infractions. You work a bit too hard in your efforts to demean Microphonics Inc.. I am curious as to your motivations. Cytotekk.