Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Linda L Currey who wrote (28564)	3/12/1999 11:51:00 AM
From: LegalBeast	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

You raise an interesting point Linda: anonynimity. Would that everyone was honest enough to allow their personal email addresses to be found, but like you, jhild has chosen to not post his (her?) personal email address. Thus, such discussions of ethics, integrety, and style must be addressed here so that folks who do read the thread can be aided in determining the veracity of the poster. Bottom line is that a poster who discusses both good points and bad, admits when they mess up, and seeks to find the truth is someone who you may get good information to make your own investing decisions. On the other hand, folks who cannot seem to be able to discuss both sides of an issue, nor do any form of DD but rather will insert their own unbased suppositions and call them facts should be ignored. Now, how does someone like yourself come on to the thread and determine the veracity of any given poster? I suggest that folks who are often called liar and fraud by lots of other folks may be generally believed to be a liar and a fraud. Likewise, folks who admit points adverse to their wishes while pointing out other events that do support their beliefs may be considered at a minimum to be open minded. Your investment decision is yours and no one elses to make. I wish you well in making that decision. However, I will not argue in private the issue that patently incorrect suppositions have been passed as fact in public. Public is the place to refute such posts IMO.

To: Linda L Currey who wrote (28564)	3/12/1999 12:11:00 PM
From: John PD	Respond to of 43774

>>>I'd like to ask that on this board, and all boards, that people keep their personal attacks personal<<< AAHHHH In a perfect world,Linda.If you think your request will be answered ANYWHERE on SI you better get a refund now.Requests like yours have gone unanswered for a LONG time. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news! JohnPD

To: Linda L Currey who wrote (28564)	3/12/1999 12:28:00 PM
From: snipper	Respond to of 43774

boy oh boy linda you just ask for it,you gonna get probably 800 + pro. and well at least 3 con,so better you don't listen to any of them and go lookin for yourself and find your own,don't let anyone direct you to anything,well maybe let me, start with the state of nevada (sos) and go were this takes you and good luck.-.snipper.

To: Linda L Currey who wrote (28564)	3/13/1999 9:19:00 AM
From: astheworldturns	Respond to of 43774

Ms.Currey, On this thread like many others, you may think that no one is talking about the stock when news in not available. Further they carry on and on and on, with only personal attacks. You must read between the lines. The dedication of the longs here is an important note, nothing worth while comes easy. Most importantly the posters that fool around the most, when the time comes are the most knowledgeable. That is the price that must be paid for pennies. In pennies, you can experience 99% loss of investment, agreed. However, when you take the time and you find that one.