Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ColleenB who wrote (28669)	3/13/1999 9:33:00 AM
From: LegalBeast	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

OK, sweety. Since you asked for it ... I suppose you never sent this message? To: LegalBeast From: ColleenB Wednesday, Dec 30 1998 7:42AM ET herb, could you please tell me which one of these is LEGALLY binding.... PanAmerican BanCorp, Inc., is a Nevada corporation formed last june. PRWT (Purewater Sciences) is a Delaware corporation. In the reverse merger, the surviving company will be the public company known as PRWT, the Delaware corporation. Our company is this one, and it is a Delaware corporation. The Nevada corporation will be dissolved. Then the Delaware company will change its name to PanAmerican BanCorp. ragingbull.com. IMO... since the reverse merger is not complete.... and we are trading under the name... PanAmerican ..... then we are trading a shell that is incorporated in NEVADA..... thanks colleen Don't go away, more to come ...

To: ColleenB who wrote (28669)	3/13/1999 9:34:00 AM
From: LegalBeast	Respond to of 43774

Or this one ... To: LegalBeast (who wrote...) From: ColleenB Wednesday, Dec 30 1998 11:27AM ET Now then, what does this tell us about PRWT? It is an empty shell in Delaware which is presently in violation of Delaware Law by not having paid its franchise taxes. what franchise taxes would it have to pay if they are not technically a part of PanAm.. which is the empty shell we all own?.... the way this thing was supposed to have worked was that PanAm would merge INTO PRWT.. and then we'd be a Delaware company... and have to abide by Delaware laws.. but john is dragging his feet on this... and why.... this has been going on for half a year.. and now we have the excuse that they shouldn't bother doing this because john's planning on merging into a different company... AHHHHH.... do you realize what this could ultimately mean???..that the shareholders of PRWT would have NOTHING... because you see...it's PanAm that would merge into this new company.. and not PRWT... there is no talk about PRWT... the only way we'd be taken care of is if it was a three way merger... yea, right.. the lawyers cannot even complete this first one... I have been digging things up like this for the past month.. and the conclusions I have drawn would make the hair on the back of your neck stand on end... and then I have the shit that barb dishes out to threaten me with expulsion... these people are not rational... for everything that I have been diggin up...I have NOTHING positive to say about PanAM... and I'm not being irrational.. in fact, I've been working on this for about 2 months... more seriously the past month... and the things these people are saying over on the bull is wrong and misleading.... I spent the ENTIRE day yesterday answering emails and PM's .... the conclusion I've drawn is that they think I'm some frenzied woman who can't control herself, that I am emotionally driven and it's affecting my investing .. and their suggestion is for me to sell... not that they want to hear what I've found... they cannot comprehend that I'm not emotional about any of this... THEIR fears prevent them from being open minded and see really what we've been dealt I have some additional information I've dug up on the implications of some of what I out lined to you and will send it out in the email group later...

To: ColleenB who wrote (28669)	3/13/1999 9:35:00 AM
From: LegalBeast	Respond to of 43774

Or this one ... To: LegalBeast (who wrote...) From: ColleenB Wednesday, Dec 30 1998 12:45PM ET In all honesty.... I have never personally spoken to either of these people... I do know that carl dumped his shares BEFORE the major dumping happened... (or so I read between the lines from what another person relayed that he said)..... oh, this could get real ugly... what I've been finding makes MTEI look like a patty cake... and to be fair.. a lot of this is speculation on my part... but my god.... if you're passing everybody on the highway and your speedometer cable is broken, does that mean you're not really speeding?.... the signs are all there. until people get up in arms and start DEMANDING information out of john and no more of this secret bullshit... and this includes the dissolution of this secret society email shit.... he will be able to continue anything he wants.... why does everybody think that these invisible money backers are happily forking out money to john?....hmmm...let's look at the big picture... a seedy part of New York (mob money), connections to Las Vegas (mob money), Boca Raton (hmmm more questionable money)... hmmm connections to Belize... hmmmmm off shore laundries?... hmmm a bank in costa rica... hmmmmm ... a bit too much for me.... the only cohesive thing I see about any of the businessess PRWT is getting involved in is money... money...money.... also...jat... he's clued several of us in on the possibility that he might not merge with PRWT... hmmmmm.... would that be his legal loophole?????.. I'm sorry.... I can only find devious reasons for all of his actions.... he's not given me any EVIDENCE to conclude otherwise also.... I'm guessing you read my post over at the bull.... lol

To: ColleenB who wrote (28669)	3/13/1999 9:36:00 AM
From: LegalBeast	Respond to of 43774

Or this one? To: LegalBeast (who wrote...) From: ColleenB Wednesday, Dec 30 1998 1:43PM ET I don't know knees... in fact.... I don't know who too many of these people are on the list.... some might be insiders... it was kristi who met carl....kristi and DealMaker... and to be honest to pursue kristi to contact carl... you'll get a pat response that this is a great buying opp.... yada yada yada.... the guy always has himself covered!!!!... always!!!! and I don't recall any earth shattering news originating from knees via the email.... and why did he contact you???? If this is really so secretive... then why you???... I'm assuming that you don't know knees.... and you're right not to fall for the cusip number... went through all of that on EDII..... I'm surprised that the posters over at the bull are not as hostile as what I've been subjected to by our little family here on SI.... in fact, they appear to be open to discussion

To: ColleenB who wrote (28669)	3/13/1999 9:37:00 AM
From: LegalBeast	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 43774

Or this one? To: LegalBeast (who wrote...) From: ColleenB Wednesday, Dec 30 1998 6:26PM ET I'm in Atlanta...not a problem........but I am very close to the two!!! I would like to know what you have uncovered, but I would caution you that knowledge can be detrimental. if you're talking about financial... I've already cut my losses.... I really would not anybody know as they will not listen to anyboby not a current share holder. Have I lost money, a bunch!!!!!!!! But this is not the issue to me.... I don't want people to lose like MTEI. .. so if this is a cath 22... you let me know what you need to know... I have nothing more to lose. if you need me to play patsy for the good of the group,.... let me know......however... playing the bearer of bad tidings does not go over well

To: ColleenB who wrote (28669)	3/13/1999 9:38:00 AM
From: LegalBeast	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

Or this one? To: LegalBeast (who wrote...) From: ColleenB Thursday, Dec 31 1998 4:05PM ET herb... I'm not ignoring you.....I'm simply worn out today.... glad to see your email message which supports what I've been claiming all along... I'm biting my tongue in not making an issue of it with Spencer.. although I would get a lot of satisfaction.... I'll start sending you some of my concerns in a few days... and what I've dug up on them.... but the reverse is the biggest one of all.... because john can do anything he wants.... So, where are all of the "findings" supporting these allegations?