Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Asia Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ron Bower who wrote (8288)	3/13/1999 4:38:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 9980

I do not see any difference between this case and the Polard case. If the guy is found to have damaged the US national security or even just engaged in spying without managing any harm, he should be in jail. That is very simple. Some people spy for money, other for idealistic reasons, but the motive should not be the determination of the outcome. I think it is wrong to make this a "Chinese" issue or a racial issue, it is a "spying" issue. I am sure that there are some good "anglo saxons" at this very minute delivering secrets to the Chinese or even to the Iranian, the national origin of those spies has nothing to do with those facts. What I would agree with is that we should not come to any conclusion just based on newsprints of incomplete information, let the court decide and if guilty, jail him until the Chinese catch one of their people spying for us and arrange for "spy exchanges". these were quite common during the cold war. Zeev