SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Broadcast.com (Acquired by Yahoo) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Sandri who wrote (768)3/14/1999 6:22:00 PM
From: neverenough  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1260
 
Will the Net kill network TV?

March 13, 1999
Web posted at: 11:03 a.m. EST (1603 GMT)

by David Needle, special to PC World


(IDG) -- If you're among the millions of users who occasionally get audio and video broadcasts on the Web even though the quality is poor, just wait--things can only get better.

"Today is the worse it will ever be," says Mark Cuban, chair and co-founder of Broadcast.com. Compression technology is improving so rapidly that in the next few years, users will get much better quality requiring less bandwidth, Cuban said in his keynote at the MultiMediaCom conference in San Jose, California.

"A user with a 500-MHz PC on a [high-speed network] will not be happy with just text and pictures," says Cuban. "If you have a business that runs on the Internet, you'd better be adding audio and video or you lose."

Bandwidth issues are a key concern to Broadcast.com, a leading provider of audio and video programming. In a videotaped introduction to his talk, Cuban said his company runs 700 video servers that accommodate as many as half a million simultaneous users. Indicating his company's growth, Cuban noted that in the three months since he made the video, the number of Broadcast.com servers had expanded to 1100.

Where is broadcasting over the Internet headed? Cuban reeled off a number of controversial predictions, including "the death of network television" in the next seven years. "TV stations won't need networks with so much digital content available over the Net," Cuban says.

Streaming media is becoming so important that Cuban predicts one of the technology's biggest facilitators, Real Networks, will be acquired within a year by a major telecommunications company looking to hop on the multimedia Internet bandwagon. The Real Networks Player software is the most popular format for listening to audio and viewing video on the Internet. Cuban predicts that if the company is bought, a raft of smaller streaming-media software vendors will emerge with new ideas and ways to improve the multimedia experience.

Cuban also predicted "an explosion" in content creation by 2001. "Everyone will be able to create their own media--for better or worse," says Cuban. "Creation tools are dropping in price, and you'll see users create zillions of hours of content."

He also expects advances in PC interfaces, such as 1394 (also called Firewire, adopted by Apple) which can easily and quickly transfer video from a digital camcorder to a computer.

"I think Mark is right on the money when he talks about how fast the Internet is growing and all the new media being adopted," says Ken Hostetler, sales and training director at Verio, an ISP based in Englewood, Colorado. "But there will be bumps in the road."

Companies aren't evaluating new technology and planning its implementation as carefully as they have in the past, Hostetler says. "For example, I don't think most people have a good way to find stuff on their hard drives today. That's only going to get way more difficult as you get bigger hard drives and new types of content coming in off the Internet."

Dusty content
Not only will waves of original content wash over the Internet, but millions of hours of "dusty content" will find new life, Cuban predicts. Broadcast.com already posts many old videos, ranging from a 1963 Tai Chi instructional tape to the first three episodes of I Love Lucy. In a play on the "information wants to be free" slogan of open source software advocates, Cuban says, "Content wants to be seen."

When an old TV show doesn't draw the ratings to warrant syndication, it ends up collecting dust unseen. But thousands or even millions of people might be interested in seeing the vintage footage.

Cuban argues that providers like Broadcast.com have the best chance to attract viewers to such programming because it is a one-stop shop. This makes it easy for consumers to start at Broadcast.com instead of hopping all over the Internet looking for specific content.

Media-asset management is a major challenge as the Internet grows, Cuban concedes. "Aggregators must learn how to manage content, simplify access, and improve the infrastructure," Cuban says.

Broadcast.com is exploring an "all you can eat" subscription service. Consumers pay, for example, $2 per month to get every new single or video a specific performer is sending out over the Internet.

"You could have a Barry Manilow community or a Pearl Jam community and those subscribers get it all," Cuban says. Conversely, searching for and downloading specific music and other content "is a bust," Cuban says. "There is just too much out there for people to search through."

Finally, Cuban says his biggest fear on the horizon is what he calls "The Little Kid Effect"--that some 15-year-old will think up a new media type we can't imagine today.

"That's what I'm most scared of," says Cuban. "Just like Amazon.com spanked Barnes & Noble."

cnn.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



To: Paul Sandri who wrote (768)3/14/1999 9:26:00 PM
From: B. A. Marlow  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1260
 
Read it, Paul. My take?

It's quite accurate. But "past performance does not necessarily imply future results." Your mileage may vary.

This stock, like a lot of others in the group, is very news sensitive. Absent news, it floats down a little on light volume. Riding a release or a rumor, it can power up smartly. We all know this. For the foreseeable future, this pattern will continue with the Nets in general and BCST in particular. It's just a fact of life.

The PaineWebber conference is an opportunity for the whole sector, especially because PWJ is a *retail* firm, not an investment bank. This coming week will be very busy: Merrill is running a huge telecom conference (T's Armstrong keynoting, etc.) and there's also a big "old media" conference at which all of the usual suspects will participate and pontificate. As if this buzz weren't enough, we're trying to drive to Dow 10k and Germany seems to have rediscovered capitalism. At least for now, it kinda looks like Buffett and Acampura are on the wrong side of the tape. Earnings warnings could clip tech sector momentum, but keep your fingers crossed.

Glad you did well with BCST, Paul. Internet Fund a good place to park. But BCST hasn't even started yet. Broadband's as hot as a pistol and much more consolidation is coming. Heck, I probably took your shares! Urge you to check in with us from time to time.

BAM

P.S. The Internet Fund doesn't hold BCST among its top 25 positions, but Ryan Jacob's got a great record. (BCST's a top 10 holding of The Amerindo Technology Fund, however.) Last year, Ryan returned almost 200 percent; to my knowledge, he was bested only by Steve Harmon's picks, up about 300 percent. (Harmon doesn't run a fund, he's buy-side analyst.) Ryan could add BCST at any time, as Harmon has recently done (in a report). For those interested in what The Internet Fund and Amerindo Technology like, here're the links:

theinternetfund.com

amerindo.com



To: Paul Sandri who wrote (768)3/14/1999 11:29:00 PM
From: Pruguy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1260
 
to go to a succesful company to a mutual fund and saying easy money is over, sounds to me like you lost big on some of your others.
Is there any reason you can point out as to why you think this will be a tougher holding in the future?